Talk:Faith/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:40Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Spencerian: +reply

2008-11-15T22:20:21Z

+reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 15 November 2008
Line 70:		Line 70:
	== Religious Parallels ==		== Religious Parallels ==
	The page mentions that Baltar's use of the river imagery for the passage to death "also parallels the rise of Christianity, which adopted things from other religions, including some rites of the established Roman polytheistic religions." This seems unsubstantiated, can we get a specific parallel? -- [[User:Turambar29\|Turambar29]] 03:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)		The page mentions that Baltar's use of the river imagery for the passage to death "also parallels the rise of Christianity, which adopted things from other religions, including some rites of the established Roman polytheistic religions." This seems unsubstantiated, can we get a specific parallel? -- [[User:Turambar29\|Turambar29]] 03:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
			:I agree. Christianity hasn't a lock on such paths. At the least, it's too general, and I agree it's unsubstantiated. Feel free to modify as you like to correct for the overgeneralization. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 22:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Turambar29 at 03:36, 13 November 2008

2008-11-13T03:36:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 13 November 2008
Line 67:		Line 67:
	::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Religious Parallels ==
			The page mentions that Baltar's use of the river imagery for the passage to death "also parallels the rise of Christianity, which adopted things from other religions, including some rites of the established Roman polytheistic religions." This seems unsubstantiated, can we get a specific parallel? -- [[User:Turambar29\|Turambar29]] 03:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Catrope: ?

2008-05-20T21:36:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 20 May 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:

	I may have missed it in other comments, but should it not be 2. We lost both Emily Kowalski and Jean.		I may have missed it in other comments, but should it not be 2. We lost both Emily Kowalski and Jean.
	:The population count for [[Guess What's Coming to Dinner]] will probably fall by two to account for this. I can't see where in this article it's inaccurate. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 09:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)		:The population count for [[Guess What's Coming to Dinner?]] will probably fall by two to account for this. I can't see where in this article it's inaccurate. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 09:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

	The article is flawless, what i meant was the change in the popluation. I am new here, so the population count reflects the last episode. [[The-Dude]] 10.24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)		The article is flawless, what i meant was the change in the popluation. I am new here, so the population count reflects the last episode. [[The-Dude]] 10.24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Gougef: /* Water depth markers on the ferry */

2008-05-15T23:03:41Z

Water depth markers on the ferry

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 15 May 2008
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Catrope: /* Water depth markers on the ferry */ reply

2008-05-15T21:02:42Z

Water depth markers on the ferry: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 15 May 2008
Line 65:		Line 65:
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

April Arcus: /* Water depth markers on the ferry */

2008-05-15T20:52:11Z

Water depth markers on the ferry

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 15 May 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Catrope: /* Water depth markers on the ferry */ what about it

2008-05-15T20:34:59Z

Water depth markers on the ferry: what about it

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 15 May 2008
Line 63:		Line 63:
	== Water depth markers on the ferry ==		== Water depth markers on the ferry ==
	Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Gougef: Another "Admiral Tigh" type incident

2008-05-15T20:24:49Z

Another "Admiral Tigh" type incident

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 15 May 2008
Line 60:		Line 60:
	::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when it's being fired upon? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when it's being fired upon? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Water depth markers on the ferry ==
			Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud: /* FTL system plot hole */

2008-05-15T19:15:30Z

FTL system plot hole

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 15 May 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:
	:All of their Raiders might have been destroyed in the battle. Why else did the Raptor approach the damaged battlestar unchallenged by a patrol? With no Raiders and a damaged FTL, Cavil's baseship might have decided to leave what's left of them behind for dead.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:All of their Raiders might have been destroyed in the battle. Why else did the Raptor approach the damaged battlestar unchallenged by a patrol? With no Raiders and a damaged FTL, Cavil's baseship might have decided to leave what's left of them behind for dead.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when ~~you~~'re being fired upon?-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when it's being fired upon? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 15 May 2008
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			:::The reason that I mention it is that likely someone sometime will try to make a big deal about when, like Admiral Tigh, it means nothing. A preemptive strike. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 15 May 2008
Line 65:		Line 65:
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			::Right. I thought this was pointed out as an Admiral Tigh kind of mistake where 12 m (or 12 ft) would be ridiculously long/short. Trying to interpret it in terms of Cylon numbers doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 21:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 15 May 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		Saw this mentioned somewhere. The Roslin ferry scene - the ferry as the depth markers 12-11-10-9 on the bow. Just another Admiral Tigh incident (doesn't really mean anything), but interesting. -- [[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:What's wrong with those markers? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 20:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			:The fact that four numbers of twelve are visible above the waterline seems like a clear reference to the four Cylons revealed in "Crossroads, Part II", but the significance eludes me. The Four are visible in some way that the Seven and the One is not? That doesn't seem to make sense. "Number Eight" is just below the surface? But we know who she is. And what of the placement in Roslin's dream, a plotline mostly unconnected to the Cylon mythology? I suppose it was probably a neat-looking throwaway, and that analyzing it as a plot clue is probably going to be fruitless. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 15 May 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:
	:All of their Raiders might have been destroyed in the battle. Why else did the Raptor approach the damaged battlestar unchallenged by a patrol? With no Raiders and a damaged FTL, Cavil's baseship might have decided to leave what's left of them behind for dead.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:All of their Raiders might have been destroyed in the battle. Why else did the Raptor approach the damaged battlestar unchallenged by a patrol? With no Raiders and a damaged FTL, Cavil's baseship might have decided to leave what's left of them behind for dead.-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		::Given their behaviour in [[He That Believeth In Me]], it seems likely that the non-lobotomized Raiders would once again retreat if ordered to attack the Cavil faction's Basestars and Raiders. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker\|Gordon Ecker]] 08:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when ~~you~~'re being fired upon?-- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:::But that assumes that the Raiders have no sense of self-preservation. I agree, non-lobotmized Raiders wouldn't attack other Cylons unprovoked, but when it's being fired upon? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 19:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)