Talk:Donald Perry/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

2025-06-24T20:11:31Z

Text replacement - "[[Image:" to "[[File:"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 24 June 2025
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:::Up where?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 09:27, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		:::Up where?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 09:27, 15 August 2006 (CDT)
	::::[[~~Image~~:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg\|thumb]] Here it is. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 10:42, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		::::[[File:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg\|thumb]] Here it is. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 10:42, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

	:::Forgive me, but I can't read any of that text other than the 2nd and 3rd Vipers' registration numbers and the three large letters on Kat's Viper (''KAT''). --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 15:55, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		:::Forgive me, but I can't read any of that text other than the 2nd and 3rd Vipers' registration numbers and the three large letters on Kat's Viper (''KAT''). --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 15:55, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:39Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* What's a "Boonie Jumper" */ fixing broken link

2009-06-21T01:56:52Z

What's a "Boonie Jumper": fixing broken link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 21 June 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::::::::: In light of your post to your user page, Merv, my reading of "apparent rage" may be erroneous, so... Well, I don't want to duplicate my post there. Just thought I'd note it here, too. Hopefully this is sorted now. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 16:34, 10 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::: In light of your post to your user page, Merv, my reading of "apparent rage" may be erroneous, so... Well, I don't want to duplicate my post there. Just thought I'd note it here, too. Hopefully this is sorted now. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 16:34, 10 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::The post earlier referred to an internal red link to [[Boonie jumper]], which shouldn't be a page here, as it's just a phrase composed of real words in standard meanings with no possibility of being more than a definition. When I removed the internal red link, I added the Wikipedia link to the real term to prevent recurrant red-linking to a non-page due to not knowing the real terms. On the meaning, the context ("boonie jumpers, shuttle jockeys, and a fleet academy washout" speaking negatively about recruits) strongly suggests an intentional parallel to the disparaging term "puddle jumper." The fact Atlantis uses a similar term for a ckass of ship is absolutely irrelevant; the Wikipedia link is not to that class of ship. An equivalent objection would be against a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_grenade on the basis of the mention of the drink. That said, if there weren't confusion over the meaning here, it wouldn't seem worth linking, so I'm not going to defy a consensus or anything. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:04, 21 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::The post earlier referred to an internal red link to [[:w:Boonie jumper\|Boonie jumper]], which shouldn't be a page here, as it's just a phrase composed of real words in standard meanings with no possibility of being more than a definition. When I removed the internal red link, I added the Wikipedia link to the real term to prevent recurrant red-linking to a non-page due to not knowing the real terms. On the meaning, the context ("boonie jumpers, shuttle jockeys, and a fleet academy washout" speaking negatively about recruits) strongly suggests an intentional parallel to the disparaging term "puddle jumper." The fact Atlantis uses a similar term for a ckass of ship is absolutely irrelevant; the Wikipedia link is not to that class of ship. An equivalent objection would be against a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_grenade on the basis of the mention of the drink. That said, if there weren't confusion over the meaning here, it wouldn't seem worth linking, so I'm not going to defy a consensus or anything. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:04, 21 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::::I don't think it's something worth arguing with each other about CalculatinAvatar, I'm sorry: it's just that, well I think I can sum up my basic view as "It is a logical jump to go from "boonie jumper" to assuming it refers to "puddle jumper" (term, in any context). I dunno. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:43, 22 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::::I don't think it's something worth arguing with each other about CalculatinAvatar, I'm sorry: it's just that, well I think I can sum up my basic view as "It is a logical jump to go from "boonie jumper" to assuming it refers to "puddle jumper" (term, in any context). I dunno. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:43, 22 February 2006 (EST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Sergeant Perry? */ plural -> singular

2008-10-09T02:10:04Z

Sergeant Perry?: plural -> singular

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 9 October 2008
Line 83:		Line 83:
	:Maybe a case where the props shouldn't be taken ''too'' seriously if it flies in the face of common sense. One where I'd rather note the rank and the possible discrepancy in the notes section than include it everywhere. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		:Maybe a case where the props shouldn't be taken ''too'' seriously if it flies in the face of common sense. One where I'd rather note the rank and the possible discrepancy in the notes section than include it everywhere. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

	: In the continuity ~~binders~~ for 104 ("[[Act of Contrition]]"), he's noted as being a Sergeant. Do keep in mind that they hadn't ironed out the whole ranking system by that time, but still that's his rank. (Yes, I'm surprised my own self.) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 02:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)		: In the continuity binder for 104 ("[[Act of Contrition]]"), he's noted as being a Sergeant. Do keep in mind that they hadn't ironed out the whole ranking system by that time, but still that's his rank. (Yes, I'm surprised my own self.) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 02:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Sergeant Perry? */ reply

2008-10-09T02:09:41Z

Sergeant Perry?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 9 October 2008
Line 82:		Line 82:

	:Maybe a case where the props shouldn't be taken ''too'' seriously if it flies in the face of common sense. One where I'd rather note the rank and the possible discrepancy in the notes section than include it everywhere. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		:Maybe a case where the props shouldn't be taken ''too'' seriously if it flies in the face of common sense. One where I'd rather note the rank and the possible discrepancy in the notes section than include it everywhere. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

			: In the continuity binders for 104 ("[[Act of Contrition]]"), he's noted as being a Sergeant. Do keep in mind that they hadn't ironed out the whole ranking system by that time, but still that's his rank. (Yes, I'm surprised my own self.) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 02:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Serenity: /* Sergeant Perry? */

2008-10-08T10:21:17Z

Sergeant Perry?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 8 October 2008
Line 80:		Line 80:

	Although this injects an element of fanwankiness (hell, this is the discussion page, not the article), could be explained that the deck crew didn't get around to changing all the Viper plates to reflect any promotions. But still ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		Although this injects an element of fanwankiness (hell, this is the discussion page, not the article), could be explained that the deck crew didn't get around to changing all the Viper plates to reflect any promotions. But still ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

			:Maybe a case where the props shouldn't be taken ''too'' seriously if it flies in the face of common sense. One where I'd rather note the rank and the possible discrepancy in the notes section than include it everywhere. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 10:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud: /* Sergeant Perry? */

2008-10-08T07:23:12Z

Sergeant Perry?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 8 October 2008
Line 78:		Line 78:

	The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? And the ranks on their collars when Thrace gave them the introductory brief on the Viper were of petty officers first class. Did Perry get demoted? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? And the ranks on their collars when Thrace gave them the introductory brief on the Viper were of petty officers first class. Did Perry get demoted? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

	Although this injects an element of fanwankiness (hell, this is the discussion page, not the article), could be explained that the deck crew didn't get around to changing all the Viper plates to reflect any promotions. But still ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		Although this injects an element of fanwankiness (hell, this is the discussion page, not the article), could be explained that the deck crew didn't get around to changing all the Viper plates to reflect any promotions. But still ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud: /* Sergeant Perry? */

2008-10-08T07:22:43Z

Sergeant Perry?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 8 October 2008
Line 78:		Line 78:

	The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? And the ranks on their collars when Thrace gave them the introductory brief on the Viper were of petty officers first class. Did Perry get demoted? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? And the ranks on their collars when Thrace gave them the introductory brief on the Viper were of petty officers first class. Did Perry get demoted? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
			Although this injects an element of fanwankiness (hell, this is the discussion page, not the article), could be explained that the deck crew didn't get around to changing all the Viper plates to reflect any promotions. But still ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud: /* Sergeant Perry? */

2008-10-08T07:14:13Z

Sergeant Perry?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 8 October 2008
Line 77:		Line 77:
	== Sergeant Perry? ==		== Sergeant Perry? ==

	The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? And the ranks on their collars when Thrace gave them the introductory brief on the Viper were of petty officers first class. Did Perry get demoted? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Fredmdbud: /* Sergeant Perry? */ new section

2008-10-08T07:07:42Z

Sergeant Perry?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 8 October 2008
Line 74:		Line 74:

	It's Sergeant Donald Perry, which matches with [[:Image:Chuckles_nameplate_-_watermarked.jpg\|this]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 05:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)		It's Sergeant Donald Perry, which matches with [[:Image:Chuckles_nameplate_-_watermarked.jpg\|this]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 05:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

			== Sergeant Perry? ==

			The credits of "Hand of God" list Costanza and Katraine as lieutenants, Stepchild's wiki entry lists her as ensign, but the prop indicates that Perry was a sergeant ... huh? Weren't these characters together as cohorts in the first intake of pilot recruits? -- [[User:Fredmdbud\|Fredmdbud]] 07:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 24 June 2025
Line 64:		Line 64:

	:::Up where?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 09:27, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		:::Up where?--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 09:27, 15 August 2006 (CDT)
	::::[[~~Image~~:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg\|thumb]] Here it is. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 10:42, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		::::[[File:Viper7961 handofgod.jpg\|thumb]] Here it is. --[[User:Talos\|Talos]] 10:42, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

	:::Forgive me, but I can't read any of that text other than the 2nd and 3rd Vipers' registration numbers and the three large letters on Kat's Viper (''KAT''). --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 15:55, 15 August 2006 (CDT)		:::Forgive me, but I can't read any of that text other than the 2nd and 3rd Vipers' registration numbers and the three large letters on Kat's Viper (''KAT''). --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar\|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar\|T]])</sup> 15:55, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 21 June 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:::::::::: In light of your post to your user page, Merv, my reading of "apparent rage" may be erroneous, so... Well, I don't want to duplicate my post there. Just thought I'd note it here, too. Hopefully this is sorted now. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 16:34, 10 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::: In light of your post to your user page, Merv, my reading of "apparent rage" may be erroneous, so... Well, I don't want to duplicate my post there. Just thought I'd note it here, too. Hopefully this is sorted now. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 16:34, 10 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::The post earlier referred to an internal red link to [[Boonie jumper]], which shouldn't be a page here, as it's just a phrase composed of real words in standard meanings with no possibility of being more than a definition. When I removed the internal red link, I added the Wikipedia link to the real term to prevent recurrant red-linking to a non-page due to not knowing the real terms. On the meaning, the context ("boonie jumpers, shuttle jockeys, and a fleet academy washout" speaking negatively about recruits) strongly suggests an intentional parallel to the disparaging term "puddle jumper." The fact Atlantis uses a similar term for a ckass of ship is absolutely irrelevant; the Wikipedia link is not to that class of ship. An equivalent objection would be against a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_grenade on the basis of the mention of the drink. That said, if there weren't confusion over the meaning here, it wouldn't seem worth linking, so I'm not going to defy a consensus or anything. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:04, 21 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::The post earlier referred to an internal red link to [[:w:Boonie jumper\|Boonie jumper]], which shouldn't be a page here, as it's just a phrase composed of real words in standard meanings with no possibility of being more than a definition. When I removed the internal red link, I added the Wikipedia link to the real term to prevent recurrant red-linking to a non-page due to not knowing the real terms. On the meaning, the context ("boonie jumpers, shuttle jockeys, and a fleet academy washout" speaking negatively about recruits) strongly suggests an intentional parallel to the disparaging term "puddle jumper." The fact Atlantis uses a similar term for a ckass of ship is absolutely irrelevant; the Wikipedia link is not to that class of ship. An equivalent objection would be against a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_grenade on the basis of the mention of the drink. That said, if there weren't confusion over the meaning here, it wouldn't seem worth linking, so I'm not going to defy a consensus or anything. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 12:04, 21 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::::I don't think it's something worth arguing with each other about CalculatinAvatar, I'm sorry: it's just that, well I think I can sum up my basic view as "It is a logical jump to go from "boonie jumper" to assuming it refers to "puddle jumper" (term, in any context). I dunno. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:43, 22 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::::I don't think it's something worth arguing with each other about CalculatinAvatar, I'm sorry: it's just that, well I think I can sum up my basic view as "It is a logical jump to go from "boonie jumper" to assuming it refers to "puddle jumper" (term, in any context). I dunno. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:43, 22 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::No, it is ''definately'' not. "Jumper" probably just refers to their ''Jump'' engines. It was a leap of faith to assume that this is a reference to "Puddle Jumpers". Further, the "gateships" on Stargate Atlantis are referred to as "Puddle Jumpers" as well, and this link only created confusion. I am removing it. My explanation on 2 December sums up my thoughts on ths subject. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:20, 9 February 2006 (EST)		:::No, it is ''definately'' not. "Jumper" probably just refers to their ''Jump'' engines. It was a leap of faith to assume that this is a reference to "Puddle Jumpers". Further, the "gateships" on Stargate Atlantis are referred to as "Puddle Jumpers" as well, and this link only created confusion. I am removing it. My explanation on 2 December sums up my thoughts on ths subject. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:20, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	::::Merv, I am getting really sick of the way you jump down someone's throat without doing even the most minimal research. Puddle jumper is a real word, as you would have figured out almost instantly by just running a [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22puddle+jumper%22 google search]. Here's the [http://www.puddlejumper.com/eindex.html first match]. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:39, 9 February 2006 (EST)		::::Merv, I am getting really sick of the way you jump down someone's throat without doing even the most minimal research. Puddle jumper is a real word, as you would have figured out almost instantly by just running a [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22puddle+jumper%22 google search]. Here's the [http://www.puddlejumper.com/eindex.html first match]. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:39, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::I know full well that it is a real word. On ''Stargate: Atlantis'', in the first episode they find a new type of ship that can fit through a Stargate; they get into a humorous arguement where McKay wants to call it a "Gateship", while Shepherd says "What, this little Puddle Jumper?". '''I have already demonstrated that it was a leap of reason to assume that "Jumper" refers to "Puddle Jumper"''', but on top of this, the most frequent place BSG viewrs might here this is in context of "Stargate Atlantis"...''The show that comes on immediately before Battlestar Galactica''. Linking this was A) unfounded speculation B) addeed confusion.		:::::I know full well that it is a real word. On ''Stargate: Atlantis'', in the first episode they find a new type of ship that can fit through a Stargate; they get into a humorous arguement where McKay wants to call it a "Gateship", while Shepherd says "What, this little Puddle Jumper?". '''I have already demonstrated that it was a leap of reason to assume that "Jumper" refers to "Puddle Jumper"''', but on top of this, the most frequent place BSG viewrs might here this is in context of "Stargate Atlantis"...''The show that comes on immediately before Battlestar Galactica''. Linking this was A) unfounded speculation B) addeed confusion.
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::::Also, when you do a [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22puddle+jumper%22 google search] as you linked above, the '''second''' [http://www.gateworld.net/omnipedia/ships/p/puddlejumper.shtml match that you find] is for the ''Stargate Atlantis'' "Puddle Jumper". And the first page of the Images search, there are images of the Stargate Atlantis Puddle-Jumper. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 23:11, 9 February 2006 (EST)		:::::Also, when you do a [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22puddle+jumper%22 google search] as you linked above, the '''second''' [http://www.gateworld.net/omnipedia/ships/p/puddlejumper.shtml match that you find] is for the ''Stargate Atlantis'' "Puddle Jumper". And the first page of the Images search, there are images of the Stargate Atlantis Puddle-Jumper. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 23:11, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	::::::I have absolutely no quarrel with the substance of your edit. My sole issue is with the tone you took in your reply to CalculatinAvatar, which implied you were disagreeing with his point. This has happened before, such as on [[Talk:Narcho]] where you attacked me for defending your own point. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 23:36, 9 February 2006 (EST)		::::::I have absolutely no quarrel with the substance of your edit. My sole issue is with the tone you took in your reply to CalculatinAvatar, which implied you were disagreeing with his point. This has happened before, such as on [[Talk:Narcho]] where you attacked me for defending your own point. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 23:36, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::You are being incredibly confusing here; you just said "I have no quarrel with the substance of your edit", yet you complained that I had not "researched" the point. Also, please actually read through my postings: because I already stated that it was from Stargate Atlantis in the edit I made in December; I knew it was a real word and I stated as much ''already''. **As for my "tone implying that I was disagreeing with him".....er, yes. Yes I was disagreeing with him. I thought that was clear. Nextly, your edits on "Narcho" were also equally confusing at the time, and you should strive to be more clear in the future, by bluntly stating as many factual points as possible in rapid succession. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 23:48, 9 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::You are being incredibly confusing here; you just said "I have no quarrel with the substance of your edit", yet you complained that I had not "researched" the point. Also, please actually read through my postings: because I already stated that it was from Stargate Atlantis in the edit I made in December; I knew it was a real word and I stated as much ''already''. **As for my "tone implying that I was disagreeing with him".....er, yes. Yes I was disagreeing with him. I thought that was clear. Nextly, your edits on "Narcho" were also equally confusing at the time, and you should strive to be more clear in the future, by bluntly stating as many factual points as possible in rapid succession. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 23:48, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	::::::::On what basis are you disagreeing with CalculatinAvatar? He seems to be making exactly the same point as you. This is why I was confused by your reply to him, since I agreed with his interpretation and you seemed to take issue with it, although in fact, you appear to be in agreement. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 23:53, 9 February 2006 (EST)		::::::::On what basis are you disagreeing with CalculatinAvatar? He seems to be making exactly the same point as you. This is why I was confused by your reply to him, since I agreed with his interpretation and you seemed to take issue with it, although in fact, you appear to be in agreement. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 23:53, 9 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::I disagree with him, because paradoxically, if you check the article history page for February 8, he '''restored''' the link when I removed it. This does, I admit, seem incongruous with his previous Talk statements above, but it was the action he took. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:31, 10 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::I disagree with him, because paradoxically, if you check the article history page for February 8, he '''restored''' the link when I removed it. This does, I admit, seem incongruous with his previous Talk statements above, but it was the action he took. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 00:31, 10 February 2006 (EST)

	::::::::::[[Wikipedia:Puddle Jumper\|Puddle Jumper]] now leads to a disambig page which mentions the real world light aircraft classification. In your opinion, is the external link still inappropriate? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:00, 10 February 2006 (EST)		::::::::::[[Wikipedia:Puddle Jumper\|Puddle Jumper]] now leads to a disambig page which mentions the real world light aircraft classification. In your opinion, is the external link still inappropriate? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:00, 10 February 2006 (EST)

	:::::::::::Hmmm...Well, I put my "thinkin' hat" on for a while, and I really think we should get rid of this superfluous (and possibly confusion-provoking) link. That's what ''I'd'' do, anyway. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 03:17, 10 February 2006 (EST)		:::::::::::Hmmm...Well, I put my "thinkin' hat" on for a while, and I really think we should get rid of this superfluous (and possibly confusion-provoking) link. That's what ''I'd'' do, anyway. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 03:17, 10 February 2006 (EST)
Line 46:		Line 46:
	Then again, maybe Mueller and Perry were two of the last names on the list by the time the scene from Home (1) was shown which is why a nugget was suggested to be CAG. Ltcrashdown December 23, 2005		Then again, maybe Mueller and Perry were two of the last names on the list by the time the scene from Home (1) was shown which is why a nugget was suggested to be CAG. Ltcrashdown December 23, 2005

	:The most damning thing with regard to nugget Perry and potential-CAG Perry being the same person is that of all the pilots seen injured in Hand of God, Perry's death is most clearly depicted. His cockpit, pressure suit and body are all punctured by the same bullet or piece of shrapnel, he is shown on-screen succumbing to asphyxiation, and Stepchild immediately announces that he has "bought it". In order to survive, he would need to 1.) resume consciousness, 2.) recover control of his Viper, 3.) escape the battle, and 4.) survive his chest wound. I find this grossly implausible. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:52, 23 December 2005 (EST)		:The most damning thing with regard to nugget Perry and potential-CAG Perry being the same person is that of all the pilots seen injured in Hand of God, Perry's death is most clearly depicted. His cockpit, pressure suit and body are all punctured by the same bullet or piece of shrapnel, he is shown on-screen succumbing to asphyxiation, and Stepchild immediately announces that he has "bought it". In order to survive, he would need to 1.) resume consciousness, 2.) recover control of his Viper, 3.) escape the battle, and 4.) survive his chest wound. I find this grossly implausible. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:52, 23 December 2005 (EST)

	::I also agree that this is ridiculous. Maybe the writer for Home (1) messed up when he referred to Perry. The only reason I am sticking to this is because Chuckles is never referred to as 'Perry' except in the closing credits, and it's unlikely that Galactica would have two pilots with the last name Perry. I'll agree to let this go until we have more information. Ltcrashdown December 23, 2005		::I also agree that this is ridiculous. Maybe the writer for Home (1) messed up when he referred to Perry. The only reason I am sticking to this is because Chuckles is never referred to as 'Perry' except in the closing credits, and it's unlikely that Galactica would have two pilots with the last name Perry. I'll agree to let this go until we have more information. Ltcrashdown December 23, 2005