Talk:Cyrannus (system)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "[[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)" to "[[The Twelve Colonies of Kobol"

2025-06-15T21:28:38Z

Text replacement - "[[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)" to "[[The Twelve Colonies of Kobol"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 15 June 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies ~~(RDM)~~\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies of Kobol\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)		:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: deleted discussion tag

2007-12-27T16:15:23Z

deleted discussion tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 27 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{deleted discussion}}

	See relevant discussion on this article [[Talk:Cyrannus\|here]]. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 14:47, 9 April 2007 (CDT)		See relevant discussion on this article [[Talk:Cyrannus\|here]]. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 14:47, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Resuming discussion */ +vote

2007-12-27T00:53:06Z

Resuming discussion: +vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 27 December 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} Per my reasons from June, which, on review, haven't changed. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:53, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Resuming discussion */ vd really is an unfortunate template name

2007-12-26T23:21:00Z

Resuming discussion: vd really is an unfortunate template name

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 26 December 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Catrope: /* Resuming discussion */ vd

2007-12-26T22:45:41Z

Resuming discussion: vd

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 26 December 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Serenity: /* Resuming discussion */

2007-12-26T22:34:52Z

Resuming discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 26 December 2007
Line 28:		Line 28:

	: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: indent vote

2007-12-26T22:30:47Z

indent vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 26 December 2007
Line 27:		Line 27:
	I see a split here regarding this article... Is this article worth keeping or no? Let's re-vote then, by the first or second week of January 2008, we can finally decide one way or the other. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)		I see a split here regarding this article... Is this article worth keeping or no? Let's re-vote then, by the first or second week of January 2008, we can finally decide one way or the other. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)

	{{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Nomination for deletion */ + resuming discussion

2007-12-26T22:30:27Z

Nomination for deletion: + resuming discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 26 December 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)		:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

			=== Resuming discussion ===

			I see a split here regarding this article... Is this article worth keeping or no? Let's re-vote then, by the first or second week of January 2008, we can finally decide one way or the other. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)

			{{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)

JubalHarshaw: /* Nomination for deletion */ - last rites complete

2007-07-02T12:22:04Z

Nomination for deletion: - last rites complete

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 2 July 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
			:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Nomination for deletion */ +vote to delete

2007-06-29T12:36:15Z

Nomination for deletion: +vote to delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:36, 29 June 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
			:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 15 June 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} - I don't really see the harm in it remaining. There was discussion awhile back in the Think Tank (Female Involvement I believe) about a new series of articles, on the "Themes" of BSG and such ... that will end up being as much speculation as (and probably less researched and cited than) this article. I think this article's existence lets us point to an excellent example of plausible speculation, well-cited ... I'll say it again, I'm an inclusionist. [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 21:23, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{Keep}} per JubalHarshaw --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:22, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies ~~(RDM)~~\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies of Kobol\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)		:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 27 December 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} Per my reasons from June, which, on review, haven't changed. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:53, 26 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 26 December 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} It's already orphaned (almost effectively deleting it anyway), and I can't think of any article it really ought to be linked from. Toast it. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 17:21, 26 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 26 December 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:
	: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)
	: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)		: {{vd}} While one can make a point for it relevance to the shows, it's really mostly a general science article and pretty much completely separated from the rest of the wiki. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 16:34, 26 December 2007 (CST)
			: {{vd}} Per reasons above --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:45, 26 December 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 26 December 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)		:{{vd}} - I've reviewed this article after remembering its generation long ago (having being split up from a single article) as well as its basis for being on the wiki. My feeling is, while researched well, there are essentially zero supporting links of the article's information to either Re-imagined Seriees or Original Series topics. In fact, the article is supposed to only cover the Original Series as the Re-imagined Series does not name its star system (and at least [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)\|tells us that it ''has'' a star system]]). Again, while the information is thought out, it doesn't support how the information directly relates to the Original Series, which is (as opposed to the time when the article was generated) against wiki policy for [[BW:FANW\|fanwanking]]. The article can be saved '''IF''' someone can show supporting information through links of the relevant information. It will be best to put a deletion timer of 1 week on this. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:36, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
	:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)		:: {{Comment}} Last rites have been performed (I've removed all the links to [[Cyrannus (system)]] on other pages (besides Talk and bot-updated pages) and made a copy of it in my user space (as I find it interesting)). [[User:JubalHarshaw\|JubalHarshaw]] 07:22, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

			=== Resuming discussion ===

			I see a split here regarding this article... Is this article worth keeping or no? Let's re-vote then, by the first or second week of January 2008, we can finally decide one way or the other. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)

			{{vd}} No real basis for this article, as all of it seems to be based on the assumption that the Twelve Colonies of the Original Series were part of the same star system. Honestly, we don't know either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 16:30, 26 December 2007 (CST)