Talk:Cylon freighter (TOS)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:39Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

April Arcus: /* Naming */ correcting my link to new namespace, for posterity's sake

2006-02-15T03:19:53Z

Naming: correcting my link to new namespace, for posterity's sake

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 15 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon ~~transport~~\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

April Arcus: Talk:Cylon fuel tanker moved to Talk:Cylon freighter (TOS)

2006-02-15T03:07:06Z

Talk:Cylon fuel tanker moved to Talk:Cylon freighter (TOS)

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:07, 15 February 2006
(No difference)

Steelviper: a freighter, by any other name, still hauls stuff

2006-02-15T02:57:56Z

a freighter, by any other name, still hauls stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 15 February 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

April Arcus: /* Naming */

2006-02-15T02:35:24Z

Naming

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 15 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)

Steelviper: Wow. TOS stuff actually can pay off.

2006-02-15T02:02:40Z

Wow. TOS stuff actually can pay off.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 15 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)

April Arcus at 01:38, 15 February 2006

2006-02-15T01:38:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 15 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding RDM craft. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)

April Arcus at 01:38, 15 February 2006

2006-02-15T01:38:00Z

New page

==Naming==
Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding RDM craft. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 15 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Naming==		==Naming==
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon ~~transport~~\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon freighter (RDM)\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 15 February 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)		::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			:::We're splitting the hairs awfully close at this point. We've got the visual evidence of the "Tanker" designation. The next ship that they encounter reads in Zac's warbook as a "freighter", but we just hear him say that. It appears for all purposes to be the same craft. I'd be ok with freighter (TOS), as that captures the General Purpose nature that it appears to display. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:57, 14 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 15 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)		Based on the schematic [[:Image:TankerWarbook.jpg\|image]] that Steelviper uploaded, wouldn't the best name for this article be just "Cylon tanker"? This also provides some insight into the identity of the corresponding [[Cylon transport\|RDM craft]]. Perhaps they should be moved to "Cylon tanker (TOS)" and "Cylon tanker (RDM)" respectively. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 20:38, 14 February 2006 (EST)
	:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)		:I agree. Come to think of it, while one of the ships they see in Saga of a Star World is a fuel tanker, the other one reads as a freighter (but they can't scan the contents due to jamming/interference). So they might be more of a multi-purpose utility ship. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 21:02, 14 February 2006 (EST)
			::Maybe "Cylon freighter (TOS)" and "Cylon freighter (RDM)" then? Is "freight" usually understood to include bothy dry and liquid goods? Or would "Cylon cargo transport" be more all-encompassing? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 14 February 2006 (EST)