Talk:Cylon Centurion Model 0005/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:44Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:Centurion 99 adds:		:Centurion 99 adds:
	:''it is implied by [[Number Six]] that some might still be around''		:''it is implied by [[Number Six]] that some might still be around''
	Haven't we been over this about half a dozen times? I thought consensus on this was that Six was most likely referring to the newer "bullethead" models. The 0005 hasn't been since since the miniseries, and only then in cardboard cutout form. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:17, 23 March 2006 (CST)		Haven't we been over this about half a dozen times? I thought consensus on this was that Six was most likely referring to the newer "bullethead" models. The 0005 hasn't been since since the miniseries, and only then in cardboard cutout form. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:17, 23 March 2006 (CST)

	:In the event that I'm misremembering, and we haven't actually discussed this before, let me briefly lay out the basis for my position.		:In the event that I'm misremembering, and we haven't actually discussed this before, let me briefly lay out the basis for my position.
	:*The current centurion still fits the appelation "walking chrome toasters", and they have been referred to explicitly by other characters on several occasions ("Let's go toaster shopping," etc.)		:*The current centurion still fits the appelation "walking chrome toasters", and they have been referred to explicitly by other characters on several occasions ("Let's go toaster shopping," etc.)
	:*The leap between the 0005 and the current model is so miniscule when compared to the leap between the centurions and the humanoid cylons that Six's comment could easily be taken to refer to the current model, even if it was a considerably more advanced variety than the 0005, the last one the colonials had truly encountered.		:*The leap between the 0005 and the current model is so miniscule when compared to the leap between the centurions and the humanoid cylons that Six's comment could easily be taken to refer to the current model, even if it was a considerably more advanced variety than the 0005, the last one the colonials had truly encountered.
	:*We haven't seen any of the 0005s since their very brief appearance in the miniseries, which appeared to be a friendly call-back to the original series. In my opinion, it's highly unlikely that we'll ever seen the 0005s again, therefore it seems unlikely that we'll ever have any positive evidence that they're still in use. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 14:36, 23 March 2006 (CST)		:*We haven't seen any of the 0005s since their very brief appearance in the miniseries, which appeared to be a friendly call-back to the original series. In my opinion, it's highly unlikely that we'll ever seen the 0005s again, therefore it seems unlikely that we'll ever have any positive evidence that they're still in use. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 14:36, 23 March 2006 (CST)

	== TOS breakout ==		== TOS breakout ==

Pst001: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */

2010-12-09T04:02:09Z

0005 — mere speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 9 December 2010
Line 91:		Line 91:
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
			:::any movement here? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 04:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */

2010-10-22T20:16:02Z

0005 — mere speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:~~BlueReistance~~\|~~BlueReistance~~]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */ indent and fixing link in BR's username

2010-10-22T18:44:15Z

0005 — mere speculation?: indent and fixing link in BR's username

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */ reply

2010-10-22T18:43:51Z

0005 — mere speculation?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 22 October 2010
Line 90:		Line 90:
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
			: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

BlueResistance: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */ response

2010-10-22T17:32:04Z

0005 — mere speculation?: response

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
			::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */

2010-10-21T18:23:27Z

0005 — mere speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 21 October 2010
Line 88:		Line 88:
	::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
			: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Graf Iblis: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */

2010-10-21T12:14:38Z

0005 — mere speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 21 October 2010
Line 87:		Line 87:
	Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)		Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
	::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	~~Maybe Early Cylon Centurion Model~~
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Graf Iblis: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */

2010-10-21T12:13:28Z

0005 — mere speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 21 October 2010
Line 87:		Line 87:
	Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)		Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
	::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
			Maybe Early Cylon Centurion Model
			The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Pst001: /* 0005 — mere speculation? */ name change! please!

2010-10-21T10:01:15Z

0005 — mere speculation?: name change! please!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:01, 21 October 2010
Line 86:		Line 86:

	Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)		Isn't it purely speculative that the designation "0005" applies to every war-era centurion design, as opposed to merely the model examined by the armistice officer? I propose the title "Cylon War Centurion Models". -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 21:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
			::for what it's worth, i think the name should be changed as well. the name "model 0005" is based on the prop document from the miniseries, which misspells the word "centurion" as "centurian". if we can disregard "centurian", i think we can also disregard "0005" as not necessarily the intention of the creators. i think something along the lines of '''Cylon Centurion (Cylon War)''' or '''Cylon War-era Centurion''' would be more appropriate. anyway that's my two cents. [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 10:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 9 December 2010
Line 91:		Line 91:
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
			:::any movement here? [[User:Pst001\|Pst001]] 04:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:~~BlueReistance~~\|~~BlueReistance~~]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
	: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		:: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 22 October 2010
Line 90:		Line 90:
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)		::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
			: I'd have no problem with that, as so long as we note the canonical name. On the other hand, [[Lee Adama]] redirects to the article [[Leland Adama]] which consists of the full first name. Again we have a six of one, half dozen of the other situation. It can go either way. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 22 October 2010
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		The document IS canon, but we really do not know whether 0005 refers to more than just the Armistice design. -- [[User:Graf Iblis\|Graf Iblis]] 12:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
	: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)		: For better or for worse, the document is canon. Also, the Re-imagined Series internal documentation (scripts and the like) tend to use both "centurion" and "centurian" spellings. Chalk that up to the ID10T error. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
			::"Model 0005" could be acknowledged in the first paragraph on the page, but it's likely not going to be the designation that most readers of this Wiki would automatically think of first. Some version of "Cylon War-era Centurion" would be more familiar and natural. If we see this model later in ''Caprica'' or in the proposed ''Blood and Chrome'', it's unlikely that characters will say "Model 0005" most of the time, anyway. I recommend having "Model 0005" redirect to a re-titled page. --[User:BlueReistance\|BlueReistance]] 17:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)