Talk:Culture in the Twelve Colonies (RDM)/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:53:39Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)		I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.		:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

April Arcus at 22:47, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T22:47:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 31 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)
			::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity at 19:22, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T19:22:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 31 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on ~~different~~ aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity at 19:21, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T19:21:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 31 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
			:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on different aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Spencerian: +concur

2007-01-31T19:16:49Z

+concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 31 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)

			::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

April Arcus at 18:52, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T18:52:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 31 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)

			::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Catrope: Concur

2007-01-31T18:11:42Z

Concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 31 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.		:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.
	:However, I don't see that with the Colonials. Their culture is very obvious and evident. Plus, as you said, it really rehashes things. Technically "Arts & Literature" would fall under 'culture' as well. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 12:07, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:However, I don't see that with the Colonials. Their culture is very obvious and evident. Plus, as you said, it really rehashes things. Technically "Arts & Literature" would fall under 'culture' as well. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 12:07, 31 January 2007 (CST)

			::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Serenity at 18:07, 31 January 2007

2007-01-31T18:07:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 31 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)		I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)

			:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.
			:However, I don't see that with the Colonials. Their culture is very obvious and evident. Plus, as you said, it really rehashes things. Technically "Arts & Literature" would fall under 'culture' as well. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 12:07, 31 January 2007 (CST)

April Arcus: New page: I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a...

2007-01-31T18:01:48Z

New page: I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a...

New page

I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)		I disagree with the need for this article. "Culture" is an extremely broad topic, and is already fully encompassed by the other articles in this series. At present, this just seems to be a rehash of the Religion article. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:01, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.		:I had the same thought. The [[Cylon Culture]] article is pretty good, as it puts several topics like Cylon religion, biology and technology into a ''new'' context, and adds some new aspects like architecture. It also works because the Cylons are somewhat mysterious.
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::I think the Twelve Colonies series pretty much covers or should cover anything one could possibly put in this article. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]] 12:11, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 31 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)
			::::I certainly agree with you for the near future. I was speaking in the very long-term. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 16:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 31 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
	:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on ~~different~~ aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)		:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles. Not sure if I make myself clear here. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 31 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Indeed. I would argue that we should be looking towards breaking [[Cylon Culture]] up into subsidiary articles as we acquire more information, rather than trying to reverse that process with the Twelve Colonies series. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 12:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
			:::I wouldn't break it up unless there is really ''tons'' of information, which I doubt will happen any time soon. What I like is how it analyzes their society by drawing on different aspects of their existance, that are different, but also vital for understanding them. They are different sides of the same coin. That would be lost in seperate articles --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:21, 31 January 2007 (CST)

	::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)		::Concur. I recommend any unique analysis be merged from this article to the Arts and Literature article. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:16, 31 January 2007 (CST)