Talk:Commanding officer/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:38:25Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Delete==		==Delete==
	Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)		Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)
	: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)		: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)
	::What he means is that it is redundant. I agree. This article isn't needed at all. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:21, 20 January 2006 (EST)		::What he means is that it is redundant. I agree. This article isn't needed at all. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:21, 20 January 2006 (EST)

2006-01-20T22:21:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 20 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)		Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)
	: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)		: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)
			::What he means is that it is redundant. I agree. This article isn't needed at all. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 17:21, 20 January 2006 (EST)

2006-01-20T22:17:47Z

Grammar fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 20 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Delete==		==Delete==
	Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)		Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)
	: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be ~~expande~~ on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)		: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)

2006-01-20T22:17:21Z

Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 20 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Delete==		==Delete==
	Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)		Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)
			: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expande on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72\|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)

2006-01-20T22:15:17Z

New page

==Delete==
Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)