Talk:Colonial Workers Alliance/Archive 1 - Revision history

Serenity: Fixed

2007-06-07T19:43:19Z

Fixed

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 7 June 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
	::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

			Should work now. And we have redirects in all variations :) --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:43, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: Talk:Colonial Worker's Alliance moved to Talk:Colonial Workers Alliance: I think something went wrong here

2007-06-07T19:41:14Z

Talk:Colonial Worker's Alliance moved to Talk:Colonial Workers Alliance: I think something went wrong here

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:41, 7 June 2007
(No difference)

Steelviper: /* Move */ real world precedent... or not

2007-06-07T19:24:10Z

Move: real world precedent... or not

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 7 June 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
			::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Move */

2007-06-07T19:12:29Z

Move

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 7 June 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
	:Do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Move */

2007-06-07T19:11:51Z

Move

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 7 June 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
			:Do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: Move

2007-06-07T19:10:13Z

Move

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 7 June 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		::Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

			== Move ==

			Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: Talk:Workers Union moved to Talk:Colonial Worker's Alliance: Using canonical name from Dirty Hands

2007-04-18T19:57:39Z

Talk:Workers Union moved to Talk:Colonial Worker's Alliance: Using canonical name from Dirty Hands

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:57, 18 April 2007
(No difference)

Spencerian: /* Name */

2007-04-18T19:56:29Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 18 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "Workers' Union" or something. With an apostrophe --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		:Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "Workers' Union" or something. With an apostrophe --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

			::Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Name */

2007-04-18T18:30:03Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 18 April 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Should we move this to the name that Roslin called it? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:26, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		:Should we move this to the name that Roslin called it? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:26, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

	:Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "~~Worker''''s''~~' Union" --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		:Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "Workers' Union" or something. With an apostrophe --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Name */

2007-04-18T18:29:34Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 18 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Roslin: Oh I'm sorry. I thought you were engaged in collective bargaining on behalf of the Colonial Worker's Alliance. If that's not the case, then..		Roslin: Oh I'm sorry. I thought you were engaged in collective bargaining on behalf of the Colonial Worker's Alliance. If that's not the case, then..
	:Should we move this to the name that Roslin called it? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:26, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		:Should we move this to the name that Roslin called it? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:26, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

			:Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "Worker''''s''' Union" --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 7 June 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
	::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

			Should work now. And we have redirects in all variations :) --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:43, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 7 June 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)		:I noted that above already :p But do we even need the apostrophe? Just "Colonial Workers Aliance" is fine too. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:11, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
			::I tried to look at real world examples, but they aren't very consistent (even when referencing the same organization). I'm fine with whatever(s, 's, s'). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:24, 7 June 2007 (CDT)