Talk:Colonial Defense Force/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:45:03Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 11 April 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: /* Deletion Timer */

2006-02-19T23:42:24Z

Deletion Timer

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 19 February 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	We need to get to deciding on deleting this again.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:39, 18 February 2006 (EST)		We need to get to deciding on deleting this again.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:39, 18 February 2006 (EST)

			==Redirect==

			This unsourced organization article is redirected to the canonical [[Colonial Fleet]]. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 18:42, 19 February 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 20:39, 18 February 2006

2006-02-18T20:39:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 18 February 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)


			We need to get to deciding on deleting this again.--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] 15:39, 18 February 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: /* Deletion Timer */

2006-02-01T02:20:42Z

Deletion Timer

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 1 February 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)

April Arcus: /* Deletion Timer */

2006-02-01T02:13:42Z

Deletion Timer

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 1 February 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)		My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens''* of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 00:07, 1 February 2006

2006-02-01T00:07:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 1 February 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)		My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens''* of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)

Spencerian: Deletion Timer

2006-01-31T22:18:07Z

Deletion Timer

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 31 January 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)
	::::We should ask [[User:Lestatdelc]] where he got the name. Unfortunatley, he hasn't been active for two months. I'd hesitate on deleting it, it could be from a podcast or a blog entry. --[[User:BMS\|BMS]] 17:38, 30 January 2006 (EST)		::::We should ask [[User:Lestatdelc]] where he got the name. Unfortunatley, he hasn't been active for two months. I'd hesitate on deleting it, it could be from a podcast or a blog entry. --[[User:BMS\|BMS]] 17:38, 30 January 2006 (EST)

			== Deletion Timer ==

			My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)

Kraetos at 22:38, 30 January 2006

2006-01-30T22:38:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 30 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)
			::::We should ask [[User:Lestatdelc]] where he got the name. Unfortunatley, he hasn't been active for two months. I'd hesitate on deleting it, it could be from a podcast or a blog entry. --[[User:BMS\|BMS]] 17:38, 30 January 2006 (EST)

The Merovingian at 21:12, 30 January 2006

2006-01-30T21:12:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 30 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
	:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)

			:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: + 2 cents

2006-01-30T20:56:01Z

+ 2 cents

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 30 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this an actual canonical name, or one we made up?--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 15:42, 30 January 2006 (EST)		Is this an actual canonical name, or one we made up?--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 15:42, 30 January 2006 (EST)
	:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
			:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 11 April 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)		::Moving it to "Colonial defense organizations" would be best in my opinion. Roslin notes to her pilot in the Miniseries to "call the Ministry of Civil Defense", suggesting yet another branch (albeit civilian). I think the differentiation for this purpose is trivial, and we can note that this is a descriptive term. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 21:20, 31 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 1 February 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)		My casual research indicates that this term is more fan-derived. I find nothing of this term yet in canonical sources, nor, as I think of it, is a logical separation; the Colonies appear to have a unified space defense force under the name of the [[Colonial Fleet]]. I'll be personally liberal in the time it takes to verify the source of this separation of armed sources, otherwise I will create a redirect of this article to [[Colonial Fleet]]. However, my fellow admins and our Imperial Bureaucrat may not be so forgiving as I am. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:18, 31 January 2006 (EST)

	Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens''* of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)		:Well, I actually believe upon viewing the evidence that "Colonial Fleet" and "Colonial Marine Corps" are two ''separate'' branches of the Colonial "military". '''However''', I really want this article deleted because it is a fanon name, and "Colonial Defence Force" is only one of literally ''dozens'' of possible names for such an organization. Why not "Colonial Strategic Self Defense Force"? "Armed Forces of the Colonies?", or "Colonial Space Service?"; there are many possible names and "Defense Force" is only one of quite a few possibilities. --[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 19:07, 31 January 2006 (EST)

			::Why not just decapitalize it, to remove the impression of an official name? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 21:13, 31 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 30 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
	:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)

			:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 30 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this an actual canonical name, or one we made up?--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 15:42, 30 January 2006 (EST)		Is this an actual canonical name, or one we made up?--[[User:Ricimer\|Ricimer]] 15:42, 30 January 2006 (EST)
	:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)		:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad\|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
			:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)