Talk:Botanical Cruiser/Archive 1 - Revision history

TaKometer at 03:56, 10 December 2006

2006-12-10T03:56:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 10 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
	:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT)		:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
			::Clearly the colonials didn't manufacture just one botanical cruiser; and at least one other botanical cruiser was refitted with FTL drive. I wonder, however, if the plants all died due to radiation exposure ([[The Passage]])[[User:TaKometer\|TaKometer]] 21:56, 9 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer: Forgot to sign it before.

2006-09-12T13:02:07Z

Forgot to sign it before.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 12 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same		Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same
	--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
	:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability		:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:02, 12 September 2006 (CDT)

BklynBruzer at 13:01, 12 September 2006

2006-09-12T13:01:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 12 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same		Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same
	--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)		--[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
			:I'm pretty sure it is, and I was gonna bring that up myself, wondering how that ship could be with the fleet but not have FTL capability

Serenity at 12:57, 12 September 2006

2006-09-12T12:57:45Z

New page

About the botanical cruiser in the series.
I noticed that ship too, but are we sure it's the same type? I think the domes are smaller and obviously it's FTL capable.
And it appears in so many different shots - also ones that have new activity, like Boomer's return to the fleet when she finds Kobol - that it can't be just stockfootage from the mini-series.
Maybe someone can find some comparative screencaps and if they are different, it should should be made clear that they aren't the same
--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:57, 12 September 2006 (CDT)