Talk:Battle of the Ionian Nebula/Archive 1 - Revision history

MickJo: /* Notes? */

2010-10-30T14:01:59Z

Notes?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 30 October 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Galactica didnt loose that dorsal battery in this battle, it was destroyed at the Battle of New Caprica. It can be seen missing in establishing shots as early as Collaborators. {{unsigned\|MickJo}}		Galactica didnt loose that dorsal battery in this battle, it was destroyed at the Battle of New Caprica. It can be seen missing in establishing shots as early as Collaborators. {{unsigned\|MickJo}}
	: Interesting, have a screenshot? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 23:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)		: Interesting, have a screenshot? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 23:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
			Cap from Collaborators, quite dark but the battery is missing.
			http://www.galacticabbs.com/gallery_images/1208763644/gallery_21_9569.jpg

2010-10-26T23:19:02Z

Notes?: reply, and adding unsigned template to end of MickJo's msg

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 26 October 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	== Notes? ==		== Notes? ==

	Galactica didnt loose that dorsal battery in this battle, it was destroyed at the Battle of New Caprica. It can be seen missing in establishing shots as early as Collaborators.		Galactica didnt loose that dorsal battery in this battle, it was destroyed at the Battle of New Caprica. It can be seen missing in establishing shots as early as Collaborators. {{unsigned\|MickJo}}
			: Interesting, have a screenshot? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 23:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

2010-10-26T22:53:38Z

Notes?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 26 October 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.--[[User:KDP3\|KDP3]] 15:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.--[[User:KDP3\|KDP3]] 15:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Not quite. He says that they "stopped the main Cylon thrust". That's not the same as saying they were destroyed. It could also mean that the wave was decimated enough to not pose a threat or that part of of them retreated. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		:Not quite. He says that they "stopped the main Cylon thrust". That's not the same as saying they were destroyed. It could also mean that the wave was decimated enough to not pose a threat or that part of of them retreated. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

			== Notes? ==

			Galactica didnt loose that dorsal battery in this battle, it was destroyed at the Battle of New Caprica. It can be seen missing in establishing shots as early as Collaborators.

2008-04-05T15:47:30Z

The 200 Raiders

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 5 April 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.--[[User:KDP3\|KDP3]] 15:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)		Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.--[[User:KDP3\|KDP3]] 15:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
			:Not quite. He says that they "stopped the main Cylon thrust". That's not the same as saying they were destroyed. It could also mean that the wave was decimated enough to not pose a threat or that part of of them retreated. -- [[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 15:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

2008-04-05T15:40:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 5 April 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== The 200 Raiders ==		== The 200 Raiders ==

	Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.		Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.--[[User:KDP3\|KDP3]] 15:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

2008-04-05T15:39:37Z

The 200 Raiders: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 5 April 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I have restored the battle. Now we just need to clean it up. :) [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 19:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)		I have restored the battle. Now we just need to clean it up. :) [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 19:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

			== The 200 Raiders ==

			Lt. Gaeta said that the Vipers wipe out the Main Cylon assault (which was the 200 raiders) but the Clyon reserve forces broke though.

2008-04-04T19:49:11Z

Restore...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 4 April 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Concur on deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:14, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		:Concur on deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:14, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

			== Restore... ==

			I have restored the battle. Now we just need to clean it up. :) [[User:Shane\|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane\|talk]]) 19:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

2007-03-27T18:14:26Z

+concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 27 March 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Concur with deletion. No "battle" has yet to occur. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:11, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		:Concur with deletion. No "battle" has yet to occur. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:11, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

			:Concur on deletion. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:14, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

2007-03-27T17:11:14Z

Premature?: + delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 27 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Agreed. No point in having this. For now [[Ionian nebula]] is more than enough. I'm for deletion --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:43, 27 March 2007 (CDT)		:Agreed. No point in having this. For now [[Ionian nebula]] is more than enough. I'm for deletion --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:43, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

			:Concur with deletion. No "battle" has yet to occur. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:11, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

2007-03-27T14:43:53Z

Voting for deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 27 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Let the writers come up with the story. The Wiki should stick to the facts.		Let the writers come up with the story. The Wiki should stick to the facts.
	--Axminster		--Axminster

			:Agreed. No point in having this. For now [[Ionian nebula]] is more than enough. I'm for deletion --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 09:43, 27 March 2007 (CDT)