Talk:Bastille Day/Archive 1 - Revision history

Serenity: Comments on recent edit

2006-12-28T17:03:31Z

Comments on recent edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 28 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)		::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)

			I shorted the Analysis paragraphs a lot while still retaining their meaning. It also reads better as the sentences had a tendency to run on too long. A moved about three points to Notes (Cally's role, visibility of the civilian fleet, Boxey's role) where I think they belong better.

			What might be moved to Analysis instead is the part about the retcon of the ''Astral Queen''. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:03, 28 December 2006 (CST)

Gougef: /* Analysis */ cleanup

2006-09-23T19:45:34Z

Analysis: cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 23 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Analysis */

2006-09-18T18:07:06Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 18 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

Gougef: /* Analysis */ Duh! ;)

2006-09-18T17:35:54Z

Analysis: Duh! ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 18 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

Steelviper: cleanup on season 1...

2006-09-18T16:43:07Z

cleanup on season 1...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 18 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Analysis ==		== Analysis ==
	Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

Gougef: Analysis needs a "fixing"

2006-09-18T16:36:45Z

Analysis needs a "fixing"

New page

== Analysis ==
Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 23 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 18 September 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
	::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)		::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
			:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)