Talk:Awards and Honors (RDM)/Archive 1 - Revision history

DrWho42: Talk:Awards and Honors moved to Talk:Awards and Honors (RDM): So that a TOS-counterpart can exist without having to increase the length of the article.

2007-11-23T20:21:40Z

Talk:Awards and Honors moved to Talk:Awards and Honors (RDM): So that a TOS-counterpart can exist without having to increase the length of the article.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:21, 23 November 2007
(No difference)

Serenity: /* Emmy */ to be expected

2007-09-17T16:05:15Z

Emmy: to be expected

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 17 September 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Emmy==		==Emmy==
	Finally... and about time too lol. At last BSG has won an Emmy. Its a shame it was only for visual effects and not writing or direction but its still a good achievement. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:22, 17 September 2007 (CDT)		Finally... and about time too lol. At last BSG has won an Emmy. Its a shame it was only for visual effects and not writing or direction but its still a good achievement. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:22, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
			:With ''Sopranos'' in the run that was too be expected, even if some predicted that the multiple nominations would cancel each other. The Emmys are known for giving out goodbye awards. Besides, those episodes were actually extremely good. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 11:05, 17 September 2007 (CDT)

Mercifull at 08:22, 17 September 2007

2007-09-17T08:22:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:22, 17 September 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)		:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
	::Actually its not that simple. Theres over half a dozen IGN awards which is more than the misc category added together. It's best to keep things seperate should they have enough different wins. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:14, 17 September 2007 (CDT)		::Actually its not that simple. Theres over half a dozen IGN awards which is more than the misc category added together. It's best to keep things seperate should they have enough different wins. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:14, 17 September 2007 (CDT)

			==Emmy==
			Finally... and about time too lol. At last BSG has won an Emmy. Its a shame it was only for visual effects and not writing or direction but its still a good achievement. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:22, 17 September 2007 (CDT)

Mercifull: /* Important and not-so-important awards/honors */

2007-09-17T08:14:02Z

Important and not-so-important awards/honors

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 17 September 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)		Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
	:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)		:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
			::Actually its not that simple. Theres over half a dozen IGN awards which is more than the misc category added together. It's best to keep things seperate should they have enough different wins. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:14, 17 September 2007 (CDT)

Mercifull: /* Important and not-so-important awards/honors */

2007-09-17T08:12:10Z

Important and not-so-important awards/honors

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 17 September 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	==Important and not-so-important awards/honors==		==Important and not-so-important awards/honors==
	Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)		Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
			:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)

Pedda: Important and not-so-important awards/honors

2007-09-16T23:17:29Z

Important and not-so-important awards/honors

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 16 September 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::I love that quote...and I'm glad that RDM didn't start any mass murdering... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:02, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		::I love that quote...and I'm glad that RDM didn't start any mass murdering... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:02, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

			==Important and not-so-important awards/honors==
			Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Podcast:Exodus Part II, Act 2 */

2007-09-09T17:02:45Z

Podcast:Exodus Part II, Act 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 9 September 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I'm still waiting for an Emmy for Bear McCreary though. The main categories are a long shot, but if a forgettable show such as ''Stargate Atlantis'' can get a music nom (in BSG's 2nd season), then it's a disgrace that BSG can't. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:41, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		:I'm still waiting for an Emmy for Bear McCreary though. The main categories are a long shot, but if a forgettable show such as ''Stargate Atlantis'' can get a music nom (in BSG's 2nd season), then it's a disgrace that BSG can't. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:41, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

			::I love that quote...and I'm glad that RDM didn't start any mass murdering... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:02, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Podcast:Exodus Part II, Act 2 */

2007-09-09T10:41:55Z

Podcast:Exodus Part II, Act 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 9 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Whew. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 05:04, 9 September 2007 (CDT)		Whew. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 05:04, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

			:I'm still waiting for an Emmy for Bear McCreary though. The main categories are a long shot, but if a forgettable show such as ''Stargate Atlantis'' can get a music nom (in BSG's 2nd season), then it's a disgrace that BSG can't. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 05:41, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: + quote

2007-09-09T10:04:01Z

+ quote

New page

==Podcast:Exodus Part II, Act 2==
"And we better win the fucking Emmy for this, this year, or I'm gonna, I swear to God." - RDM

Whew. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:04, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 17 September 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)		Um, why are AFI and Time listed under Misc, while IGN.com has its own entry? --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 18:17, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
	:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)		:Probably because IGN was added before the other awards were won and it was decided to put them into a misc category. I'mm move it now. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:12, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
			::Actually its not that simple. Theres over half a dozen IGN awards which is more than the misc category added together. It's best to keep things seperate should they have enough different wins. --[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 03:14, 17 September 2007 (CDT)