Talk:Armistice Officer/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:45:50Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 11 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)		In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)

	:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)		:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Sexual Assault==		==Sexual Assault==
	:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''		:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''
	I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)		I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

	:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)		:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

Evan: sexual assault?

2006-07-06T22:43:43Z

sexual assault?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 6 July 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO ''anything'', but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)		::Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO ''anything'', but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)

			:It was a sexual assault -- the guy didn't really object, but he was understandably scared out of his wits. But the problem is that "sexual assault" is a ''legal'' term that covers a very broad range of actions. I've replaced it with a straight description of events. Maybe "forcibly kisses" is kind of an odd turn of phrase, but it is more specifically descriprive. --[[User:Evan\|Evan]] 17:43, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Sexual Assault */

2006-04-25T13:41:50Z

Sexual Assault

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 25 April 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)		:Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

			::Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO ''anything'', but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)

CalculatinAvatar: /* Sexual Assault */

2006-04-24T18:24:43Z

Sexual Assault

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:24, 24 April 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)		:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

			:Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar\|CalculatinAvatar]] 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Sexual Assault */

2006-04-24T18:01:37Z

Sexual Assault

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 24 April 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''		:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''
	I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)		I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

			:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 00:34, 23 April 2006

2006-04-23T00:34:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 23 April 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)		:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)

			==Sexual Assault==
			:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"''
			I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian at 18:17, 13 December 2005

2005-12-13T18:17:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 13 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)		In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)

			:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)

April Arcus at 21:30, 8 December 2005

2005-12-08T21:30:47Z

New page

In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)