Talk:Adama/Archive 1 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Family tree */ reply

2010-02-24T15:56:35Z

Family tree: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 24 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::: Given Ruth's growing importance in the series, particularly starting with "[[Gravedancing]]," I agree that she should be added. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 15:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Pedda: /* Family tree */ reply

2010-02-24T15:40:55Z

Family tree: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 24 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
	::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Noneofyourbusiness at 00:31, 18 February 2010

2010-02-18T00:31:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 18 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
	: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
			::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Family tree */ reply

2010-02-17T16:12:41Z

Family tree: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 17 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Family tree ==		== Family tree ==
	Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
			: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Pedda: Ruth and Gianne

2010-02-17T12:40:57Z

Ruth and Gianne

New page

== Family tree ==
Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 24 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::: Given Ruth's growing importance in the series, particularly starting with "[[Gravedancing]]," I agree that she should be added. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 15:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 24 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [[bsp:\|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
	::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness\|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda\|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)