Sources talk:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006 - Revision history

April Arcus: name change

2020-04-11T08:31:21Z

name change

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 11 April 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts ~~Peter~~ mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts April mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Page Change Name... ==		== Page Change Name... ==

	~~Peter~~, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		April, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:11Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:*Title of episode 3x02		:*Title of episode 3x02
	:*Death of Ellen Tigh around episode four		:*Death of Ellen Tigh around episode four
	:--[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:06, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:--[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:06, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::Do we officially condemn Koenigrules? (Your call). --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 01:15, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::Do we officially condemn Koenigrules? (Your call). --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 01:15, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

Line 15:		Line 15:

	Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Yes. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

	== Deletetion ==		== Deletetion ==
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	:I agree. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I agree. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: /* Deletetion */

2006-05-10T03:13:25Z

Deletetion

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 10 May 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
			:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Deletetion */

2006-05-10T02:50:02Z

Deletetion

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 10 May 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
			: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Shane: Deletetion

2006-05-10T02:48:38Z

Deletetion

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 10 May 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Yes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		:Yes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

			== Deletetion ==

			I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus: Sources talk:Precipice moved to Sources talk:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006

2006-04-26T05:47:51Z

Sources talk:Precipice moved to Sources talk:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:47, 26 April 2006
(No difference)

April Arcus: /* Page Change Name... */

2006-04-26T05:47:32Z

Page Change Name...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 26 April 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
			:Yes. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

Shane: Page Change Name...

2006-04-26T05:41:44Z

Page Change Name...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 26 April 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

			== Page Change Name... ==

			Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

The Merovingian at 18:11, 16 April 2006

2006-04-16T18:11:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 16 April 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
			::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

April Arcus at 16:01, 16 April 2006

2006-04-16T16:01:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 16 April 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
			:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 11 April 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts ~~Peter~~ mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts April mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Page Change Name... ==		== Page Change Name... ==

	~~Peter~~, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		April, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:*Title of episode 3x02		:*Title of episode 3x02
	:*Death of Ellen Tigh around episode four		:*Death of Ellen Tigh around episode four
	:--[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:06, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:--[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:06, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::Do we officially condemn Koenigrules? (Your call). --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 01:15, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::Do we officially condemn Koenigrules? (Your call). --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 01:15, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

Line 15:		Line 15:

	Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		Peter, think we should move this page to '''[[Sources:Subject 2 Discussion, 11 April 2006]]'''? --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 00:41, 26 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Yes. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)		:Yes. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 00:47, 26 April 2006 (CDT)

	== Deletetion ==		== Deletetion ==
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	:I agree. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		:I agree. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 10 May 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		I don't think we should delete this because it's historical value or the "rumor" vote. We might want to re-link this once we get to the episode that has some of these "rumors" if any become true. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 21:48, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
	: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)		: Good point. If only for the historical value. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
			:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:13, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 16 April 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
			::::::Agreed. But we can achive a consensus position. I also agree with what Joe just said. "Koenigrules said it" isn't a source. For the past year I've heard him making interviews on Subject2discussion, but I never really questioned who he was. I assumed he was near production or something. I have the sinking suspicion that he's just a prominent Galacticastation member. --[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 13:11, 16 April 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 16 April 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		:::"Condemning" him isn't an option, and as always, any citation is better than nothing. But we should approach his reports with a healthy skepticism and try to uncover his primary sources. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 01:52, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::Probably because I'm half asleep and I've been watching Apocalypse Now reruns all day, but my patience with Koenigrules is running thin. I honestly don't know why he is considered a more important news source than us by GalacticaStation, he usually just reports stuff based on the things we've seen. Look, really I've had nothing against him before this at all. But like dominoes, I saw all the news sites reporting his interpretation of a poorly sourced script as if it was fact, and I'm annoyed--->regardless: I don't want to "condemn" him, I want to know if our official position is that his report is lousy, so that when I'm on the official site, I can say "at BattlestarWiki, we analyzed this and decided he didn't know any more than we did", because if anyone doesn't want me to say that, I will not. But it comes up in conversation alot, but I thought the right thing would be to check here first. ****Brilliant idea. I should try to get an interview with Subject2Discussion, to hype the Golden Toaster Awards which I am a spokesperson for, and mention in passing that KR was a little...overzealous in his reporting. Overzealous is a better word than condemn. The horror....the horror....--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 02:12, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
	:: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)		::::: Well, frankly, we need to find KR's sources prior to making any assertions on the validity -- or lack thereof -- of his interpretation. I would really like to know how he obtained the two facts Peter mentioned above. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 09:20, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
			:::::Well, I'm personally dsappointed wth him, but I can't articulate a postion for the entire wiki. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 11:01, 16 April 2006 (CDT)