Portal talk:Cylons - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Joe Beaudoin Jr. moved page User talk:Vandal/Cylons to Portal talk:Cylons over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Reverting unauthorized page moves

2026-03-05T03:52:33Z

Joe Beaudoin Jr. moved page User talk:Vandal/Cylons to Portal talk:Cylons over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Reverting unauthorized page moves

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:52, 5 March 2026
(No difference)

Vandal: Vandal moved page Portal talk:Cylons to User talk:Vandal/Cylons

2026-03-05T01:33:10Z

Vandal moved page Portal talk:Cylons to User talk:Vandal/Cylons

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:33, 5 March 2026
(No difference)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:58:47Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:::The idea behind the portals would be not to replace an existing article, but to act as a central hub for activity and interest about specific topics. Example: [[Wikipedia:Portal:Physics]]. The person who started this Portal intended it to encompass ALL Cylons, but there's probably a lot more interest and activity related to the RDM Cylons. There was actually some pretty interesting stuff on earlier versions of this page if you dig back into the history, but there are currently technical difficulties that are keeping the portal boxes from being implemented as smoothly as the Wikipedia one (check out the code behind the wikipedia portal). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:02, 17 April 2006 (CDT)		:::The idea behind the portals would be not to replace an existing article, but to act as a central hub for activity and interest about specific topics. Example: [[Wikipedia:Portal:Physics]]. The person who started this Portal intended it to encompass ALL Cylons, but there's probably a lot more interest and activity related to the RDM Cylons. There was actually some pretty interesting stuff on earlier versions of this page if you dig back into the history, but there are currently technical difficulties that are keeping the portal boxes from being implemented as smoothly as the Wikipedia one (check out the code behind the wikipedia portal). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:02, 17 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::I'm not sure there really is one, particularly with as small an article space as we have compared to wikipedia. At any rate, having TOS, 1980 and RDM content mixed together doesn't strike me as very useful. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 10:40, 17 April 2006 (CDT)		:::I'm not sure there really is one, particularly with as small an article space as we have compared to wikipedia. At any rate, having TOS, 1980 and RDM content mixed together doesn't strike me as very useful. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 10:40, 17 April 2006 (CDT)

	== Current Human-Cylon Models Sub-Portal ==		== Current Human-Cylon Models Sub-Portal ==
Line 66:		Line 66:
	* "Number Two: This is three downloads for me." that is the quote from the Captioning for Exodus Part I.		* "Number Two: This is three downloads for me." that is the quote from the Captioning for Exodus Part I.
	:{{neutral}} (Are we allowed to use that outside of actual votes?) --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 20:00, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{neutral}} (Are we allowed to use that outside of actual votes?) --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 20:00, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Captioning evidence is far to flimsy. Let's be patient. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:05, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Captioning evidence is far to flimsy. Let's be patient. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:05, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Ditto with what Peter said, and I'd like him to be Number Two, but can't let emotions guide the reporting.--[[User:Straycat0\|Straycat0]] 20:08, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Ditto with what Peter said, and I'd like him to be Number Two, but can't let emotions guide the reporting.--[[User:Straycat0\|Straycat0]] 20:08, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Also. CC is designed to indetify which person is speaking. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:11, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Also. CC is designed to indetify which person is speaking. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:11, 29 October 2006 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* "Human-Cylon Models of the Reimagined Series" Box Clean-Up? */ rm redlink

2010-01-30T01:43:27Z

"Human-Cylon Models of the Reimagined Series" Box Clean-Up?: rm redlink

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 30 January 2010
Line 77:		Line 77:
	== "Human-Cylon Models of the Reimagined Series" Box Clean-Up? ==		== "Human-Cylon Models of the Reimagined Series" Box Clean-Up? ==

	Does anyone else think that the current layout for the Cylon Agent box is getting messy. It'd be a great template if we had more numbers, and it was fine with just Leoben, Cavil, and Simon, but now that we've gotten four more cylons, it just seems kind of silly to have all those blank heads and then the other seven down below, taking up so much room. I really like ~~[[this template\|~~http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Cylon_Models#Known_Models]]. Changing the one here to that one I think would work well. Another thing we could do is just reduce the spacing between the Number Unknown cylons in this template. There's no reason they need three lines. Reduce the spacing, and you can get all four of the newest ones onto a single line. If, IF, we ever get the rest of the numbers, I think this template could be great, but with so many numbers unknown, it seems cluttered to me. [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 13:19, 12 April 2007 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that the current layout for the Cylon Agent box is getting messy. It'd be a great template if we had more numbers, and it was fine with just Leoben, Cavil, and Simon, but now that we've gotten four more cylons, it just seems kind of silly to have all those blank heads and then the other seven down below, taking up so much room. I really like http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Cylon_Models#Known_Models. Changing the one here to that one I think would work well. Another thing we could do is just reduce the spacing between the Number Unknown cylons in this template. There's no reason they need three lines. Reduce the spacing, and you can get all four of the newest ones onto a single line. If, IF, we ever get the rest of the numbers, I think this template could be great, but with so many numbers unknown, it seems cluttered to me. [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 13:19, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
	:Right. The unknowns should be removed in the list of all 12, and all members of the Significant Seven be put there. Then the Final Five (Four) can be listed below. I don't share the obsession about their numbers anyways. There is no meaning behind them. Right now, it's just pointless duplication. I think it looks much better now. Comments? --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:42, 12 April 2007 (CDT)		:Right. The unknowns should be removed in the list of all 12, and all members of the Significant Seven be put there. Then the Final Five (Four) can be listed below. I don't share the obsession about their numbers anyways. There is no meaning behind them. Right now, it's just pointless duplication. I think it looks much better now. Comments? --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 13:42, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
	::It looks scattered and confusing to me right now. Can't you get it into a nice 4x3 matrix? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:59, 12 April 2007 (CDT)		::It looks scattered and confusing to me right now. Can't you get it into a nice 4x3 matrix? --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:59, 12 April 2007 (CDT)

Mevenstar: /* "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads) */

2007-07-05T15:40:29Z

"Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 5 July 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)		"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)...
	:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			the entire Wiki is at the mercy of Laura Rolin's dizzy spell and kara's new bod...they can't both be cylons.
			"isn't smart enough" is a humble way out alot of people cannot accept the kobol lords or anything reminescent to a being of light apeaaring on the show..the shows gripping realism is at stake if Kara is anything but AI. I'd
			claim ignornace too.--[[User:Mevenstar\|Mevenstar]] 10:40, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

BklynBruzer: /* "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads) */

2007-06-20T14:25:04Z

"Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 20 June 2007
Line 104:		Line 104:
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads) */ textbook example

2007-06-20T13:35:13Z

"Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads): textbook example

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 20 June 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)		"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads) */ concur

2007-06-20T12:20:34Z

"Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads): concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 20 June 2007
Line 102:		Line 102:

	"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)		"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
			:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

OTW: "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads)

2007-06-19T22:00:35Z

"Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 19 June 2007
Line 98:		Line 98:
	Can anyone explain what is going on with the "Final Stats" section of the Last Cylon box. Number of Suspected Cylons: 5? Where did this number come from? What does it mean? [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 01:39, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		Can anyone explain what is going on with the "Final Stats" section of the Last Cylon box. Number of Suspected Cylons: 5? Where did this number come from? What does it mean? [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 01:39, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
	:It's the number of people that have featured in our "Suspected Cylon of the Week" section (a misnomer, as it's been updated roughly every two months), more precisely Billy, Gaeta, Jammer, Dee, Ellen and Kat (so it's supposed to be 6, I changed it) "Total guesses right: 0" means none of those five actually turned out to be a Cylon. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:24, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		:It's the number of people that have featured in our "Suspected Cylon of the Week" section (a misnomer, as it's been updated roughly every two months), more precisely Billy, Gaeta, Jammer, Dee, Ellen and Kat (so it's supposed to be 6, I changed it) "Total guesses right: 0" means none of those five actually turned out to be a Cylon. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:24, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

			== "Suspected Cylon of the Week" (Post Crossroads) ==

			"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* Some questions */ reply

2007-04-18T12:24:08Z

Some questions: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 18 April 2007
Line 97:		Line 97:

	Can anyone explain what is going on with the "Final Stats" section of the Last Cylon box. Number of Suspected Cylons: 5? Where did this number come from? What does it mean? [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 01:39, 18 April 2007 (CDT)		Can anyone explain what is going on with the "Final Stats" section of the Last Cylon box. Number of Suspected Cylons: 5? Where did this number come from? What does it mean? [[User:Alpha5099\|Alpha5099]] 01:39, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
			:It's the number of people that have featured in our "Suspected Cylon of the Week" section (a misnomer, as it's been updated roughly every two months), more precisely Billy, Gaeta, Jammer, Dee, Ellen and Kat (so it's supposed to be 6, I changed it) "Total guesses right: 0" means none of those five actually turned out to be a Cylon. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 07:24, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:::The idea behind the portals would be not to replace an existing article, but to act as a central hub for activity and interest about specific topics. Example: [[Wikipedia:Portal:Physics]]. The person who started this Portal intended it to encompass ALL Cylons, but there's probably a lot more interest and activity related to the RDM Cylons. There was actually some pretty interesting stuff on earlier versions of this page if you dig back into the history, but there are currently technical difficulties that are keeping the portal boxes from being implemented as smoothly as the Wikipedia one (check out the code behind the wikipedia portal). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:02, 17 April 2006 (CDT)		:::The idea behind the portals would be not to replace an existing article, but to act as a central hub for activity and interest about specific topics. Example: [[Wikipedia:Portal:Physics]]. The person who started this Portal intended it to encompass ALL Cylons, but there's probably a lot more interest and activity related to the RDM Cylons. There was actually some pretty interesting stuff on earlier versions of this page if you dig back into the history, but there are currently technical difficulties that are keeping the portal boxes from being implemented as smoothly as the Wikipedia one (check out the code behind the wikipedia portal). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:02, 17 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::I'm not sure there really is one, particularly with as small an article space as we have compared to wikipedia. At any rate, having TOS, 1980 and RDM content mixed together doesn't strike me as very useful. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 10:40, 17 April 2006 (CDT)		:::I'm not sure there really is one, particularly with as small an article space as we have compared to wikipedia. At any rate, having TOS, 1980 and RDM content mixed together doesn't strike me as very useful. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 10:40, 17 April 2006 (CDT)

	== Current Human-Cylon Models Sub-Portal ==		== Current Human-Cylon Models Sub-Portal ==
Line 66:		Line 66:
	* "Number Two: This is three downloads for me." that is the quote from the Captioning for Exodus Part I.		* "Number Two: This is three downloads for me." that is the quote from the Captioning for Exodus Part I.
	:{{neutral}} (Are we allowed to use that outside of actual votes?) --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 20:00, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{neutral}} (Are we allowed to use that outside of actual votes?) --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 20:00, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Captioning evidence is far to flimsy. Let's be patient. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 20:05, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Captioning evidence is far to flimsy. Let's be patient. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 20:05, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Ditto with what Peter said, and I'd like him to be Number Two, but can't let emotions guide the reporting.--[[User:Straycat0\|Straycat0]] 20:08, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Ditto with what Peter said, and I'd like him to be Number Two, but can't let emotions guide the reporting.--[[User:Straycat0\|Straycat0]] 20:08, 29 October 2006 (CST)
	:{{oppose}} Also. CC is designed to indetify which person is speaking. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:11, 29 October 2006 (CST)		:{{oppose}} Also. CC is designed to indetify which person is speaking. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:11, 29 October 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 5 July 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)		"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)...
	:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			the entire Wiki is at the mercy of Laura Rolin's dizzy spell and kara's new bod...they can't both be cylons.
			"isn't smart enough" is a humble way out alot of people cannot accept the kobol lords or anything reminescent to a being of light apeaaring on the show..the shows gripping realism is at stake if Kara is anything but AI. I'd
			claim ignornace too.--[[User:Mevenstar\|Mevenstar]] 10:40, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 20 June 2007
Line 104:		Line 104:
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
	:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			:I personally like it, it's funny. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 20 June 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)		"We aren't smart enough to figure it out", doesn't really make sense (and it also puts more faith in the writers than is really justified. In my opinion we should either start speculating again or cut the section. [[User:OTW\|OTW]] 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
	:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)		:Concur. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:20, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
			:I agree. Having a section that basically says "we can't think of anything useful to put here" is a textbook example of superfluousness. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:35, 20 June 2007 (CDT)