Podcast talk:Torn - Revision history

PrePressChris: /* Transcript Conventions */ reply

2006-12-01T23:32:11Z

Transcript Conventions: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 1 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)		There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)
	:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)		:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)
			:::I thought so. They must have snuck in when links were added. [[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 17:32, 1 December 2006 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Transcript Conventions */ + answer

2006-12-01T18:26:49Z

Transcript Conventions: + answer

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 1 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Transcript Conventions ==		== Transcript Conventions ==
	There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)		There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)
			:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)

PrePressChris: Style question

2006-11-29T17:32:58Z

Style question

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 29 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Cornell Student Copyright==		== Cornell Student Copyright==
	I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST)		I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST)


			== Transcript Conventions ==
			There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)

Steelviper: copyright question

2006-11-08T17:25:34Z

New page

== Cornell Student Copyright==
I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 1 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)		There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)
	:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)		:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)
			:::I thought so. They must have snuck in when links were added. [[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 17:32, 1 December 2006 (CST)