This is a good placeholder, but we're going to need a better pic later. --The Merovingian 03:16, 18 February 2006 (EST)
- I think there are slightly better resolution versions of this online, I will try and find the one that best resembles this specific cap. --Sauron18 20 March 2006
- This any better? :) --Fordsierra4x4 20:32, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
- How exactly is that one different from the previous? --Sauron18 23:50, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
- Larger in dimensions but fuzzy and not such good quality as the previous one. I am tempted to revert... --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 04:22, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- According to photoshop, the previous version had less detail and was darker. This is from the same HDTV source as well, just passed through a shadow/highlight filter, and made to 50% of the original HDTV source, rather than an odd scaling of it. --Fordsierra4x4 06:31, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- I don't know, it just looks like the other but more blurry. Btw, why was the credit to the capper removed? I'm getting mixed signals here, sometimes I'm told we shouldn't credit the capper anywhere, and sometimes I'm told we should. If you say it's from the same source then it should still credit her. --Sauron18 09:14, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Because i capped this myself from the same Universal HD transport stream, it didnt come from whoever had uploaded the previous one. This is taken direct from the MPEG-2 .TS from hdbits. --Fordsierra4x4 12:00, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Ok. Anyways, I compared the two and it did feel like I was putting on and taking off glasses. I dunno what you did to make it blurry, but I think we should either revert it or upload a non-blurish one. --Sauron18 12:52, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Its in my opinion that clarity trumps dimensions of image every time. So if everyone else agrees i will revert back. No hard feelings Ford I know how hard you work to get these pics, but you must understand my reasoning? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 12:58, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Personally, i dont mind about reverting, but i cant see how my capping it can make any difference, seeing as its coming from the same transport stream, and I cant see any difference between the two other than mine is brighter and larger dimensions *shrug* --Fordsierra4x4 13:23, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- You capping it doesn't make a difference. My question about why you removed the capper was because you had said it was form the same source, and I assumed you meant the same capper. Anyways, it's the clarity of the picture that mattered, not who capped it. --Sauron18 14:35, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Personally, i dont mind about reverting, but i cant see how my capping it can make any difference, seeing as its coming from the same transport stream, and I cant see any difference between the two other than mine is brighter and larger dimensions *shrug* --Fordsierra4x4 13:23, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Its in my opinion that clarity trumps dimensions of image every time. So if everyone else agrees i will revert back. No hard feelings Ford I know how hard you work to get these pics, but you must understand my reasoning? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 12:58, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Ok. Anyways, I compared the two and it did feel like I was putting on and taking off glasses. I dunno what you did to make it blurry, but I think we should either revert it or upload a non-blurish one. --Sauron18 12:52, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Because i capped this myself from the same Universal HD transport stream, it didnt come from whoever had uploaded the previous one. This is taken direct from the MPEG-2 .TS from hdbits. --Fordsierra4x4 12:00, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- I don't know, it just looks like the other but more blurry. Btw, why was the credit to the capper removed? I'm getting mixed signals here, sometimes I'm told we shouldn't credit the capper anywhere, and sometimes I'm told we should. If you say it's from the same source then it should still credit her. --Sauron18 09:14, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- According to photoshop, the previous version had less detail and was darker. This is from the same HDTV source as well, just passed through a shadow/highlight filter, and made to 50% of the original HDTV source, rather than an odd scaling of it. --Fordsierra4x4 06:31, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
- Larger in dimensions but fuzzy and not such good quality as the previous one. I am tempted to revert... --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 04:22, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
