Category talk:Wikipedians - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Deletion */ reply

2007-08-16T16:16:22Z

Deletion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 16 August 2007
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I originally deleted the Wikipedian category and all its sub-categories (and changed all people who added it manually), but it seems some people think of themselves as Wikipedia users too, even if that was never the intention of the category. So I restored the main category and added a line to the User Data template about adding it manually. But I don't think it's used very often, so we don't need to bother with all the sub categories. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:57, 16 August 2007 (CDT)		I originally deleted the Wikipedian category and all its sub-categories (and changed all people who added it manually), but it seems some people think of themselves as Wikipedia users too, even if that was never the intention of the category. So I restored the main category and added a line to the User Data template about adding it manually. But I don't think it's used very often, so we don't need to bother with all the sub categories. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:57, 16 August 2007 (CDT)
			: Right. No problem with that, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 11:16, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: Note about deletion

2007-08-16T13:57:59Z

Note about deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 16 August 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:

	::::::::::An über-encyclopedia is nice... but not feasible, more due to human constraints than any technical ones. (Wikipedia has problems with quality control, policing vandalism, and the like now... and that's with articles they deem notable enough for inclusion!) As for the color scheme thing... speaking from experience with MediaWiki, it's more a technical issue. I'm sure it could be implemented, but there are so many other things that take precedence, such as a good WYSIWYG editor to make wiki editing easier to name one. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:37, 7 August 2007 (CDT)		::::::::::An über-encyclopedia is nice... but not feasible, more due to human constraints than any technical ones. (Wikipedia has problems with quality control, policing vandalism, and the like now... and that's with articles they deem notable enough for inclusion!) As for the color scheme thing... speaking from experience with MediaWiki, it's more a technical issue. I'm sure it could be implemented, but there are so many other things that take precedence, such as a good WYSIWYG editor to make wiki editing easier to name one. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:37, 7 August 2007 (CDT)

			== Deletion ==

			I originally deleted the Wikipedian category and all its sub-categories (and changed all people who added it manually), but it seems some people think of themselves as Wikipedia users too, even if that was never the intention of the category. So I restored the main category and added a line to the User Data template about adding it manually. But I don't think it's used very often, so we don't need to bother with all the sub categories. --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:57, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

Serenity at 13:47, 16 August 2007

2007-08-16T13:47:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 16 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{deleted discussion}}~~

	How is it that Joe B. got his name to appear without the User: bit in front of it, but the rest of us retain it? I'd rather be sorted under D, than U, really. I realize this is a minor thing. I just thought I'd wonder out loud. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 14:26, 29 August 2005 (EDT)		How is it that Joe B. got his name to appear without the User: bit in front of it, but the rest of us retain it? I'd rather be sorted under D, than U, really. I realize this is a minor thing. I just thought I'd wonder out loud. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 14:26, 29 August 2005 (EDT)
	: Actually, I just did it in the normal namespace (i.e. without the "User" prefix. I do, however, plan on rectifying this. So please don't follow my wiki faux pas. Thanks! -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 29 August 2005 (EDT)		: Actually, I just did it in the normal namespace (i.e. without the "User" prefix. I do, however, plan on rectifying this. So please don't follow my wiki faux pas. Thanks! -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 29 August 2005 (EDT)

Serenity: deleted discussion tag

2007-08-16T13:21:51Z

deleted discussion tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 16 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{deleted discussion}}

	How is it that Joe B. got his name to appear without the User: bit in front of it, but the rest of us retain it? I'd rather be sorted under D, than U, really. I realize this is a minor thing. I just thought I'd wonder out loud. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 14:26, 29 August 2005 (EDT)		How is it that Joe B. got his name to appear without the User: bit in front of it, but the rest of us retain it? I'd rather be sorted under D, than U, really. I realize this is a minor thing. I just thought I'd wonder out loud. --[[User:Day\|Day]] 14:26, 29 August 2005 (EDT)
	: Actually, I just did it in the normal namespace (i.e. without the "User" prefix. I do, however, plan on rectifying this. So please don't follow my wiki faux pas. Thanks! -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 29 August 2005 (EDT)		: Actually, I just did it in the normal namespace (i.e. without the "User" prefix. I do, however, plan on rectifying this. So please don't follow my wiki faux pas. Thanks! -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin\|Joe Beaudoin]] 22:44, 29 August 2005 (EDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */ reply

2007-08-08T00:37:23Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 8 August 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:::::::::The only reason I don't like Galactipedia (otherwise its cute)is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchikers_guide] (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only if... wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instance, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous		:::::::::The only reason I don't like Galactipedia (otherwise its cute)is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchikers_guide] (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only if... wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instance, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous

			::::::::::An über-encyclopedia is nice... but not feasible, more due to human constraints than any technical ones. (Wikipedia has problems with quality control, policing vandalism, and the like now... and that's with articles they deem notable enough for inclusion!) As for the color scheme thing... speaking from experience with MediaWiki, it's more a technical issue. I'm sure it could be implemented, but there are so many other things that take precedence, such as a good WYSIWYG editor to make wiki editing easier to name one. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 19:37, 7 August 2007 (CDT)

Philpotomous: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */

2007-08-07T06:30:44Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 7 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)
	The ~~biggest~~ reason I don't like Galactipedia is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only...~~if Wikipedia~~ itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For ~~instnace~~, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous
			:::::::::The only reason I don't like Galactipedia (otherwise its cute)is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchikers_guide] (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only if... wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instance, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous

Philpotomous: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */

2007-08-07T06:19:05Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 7 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)
			The biggest reason I don't like Galactipedia is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only...if Wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instnace, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous

Catrope: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */ was away

2007-06-24T19:30:57Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?: was away

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 24 June 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Shane: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */

2007-06-21T21:38:05Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 21 June 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: /* What ''is'' a Wikipedian? */ editing template = 90%

2007-06-21T21:10:27Z

What ''is'' a Wikipedian?: editing template = 90%

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 21 June 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::Galactipedian has my vote as well. Unfortunately, moving categories isn't possible (yet, there are [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8685 plans] do implement that in 1.11), so we'd need to delete the old cats, recreate them under a different name (e.g. "Galactipedians (UK)"), and update all links. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:16, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::Galactipedian has my vote as well. Unfortunately, moving categories isn't possible (yet, there are [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8685 plans] do implement that in 1.11), so we'd need to delete the old cats, recreate them under a different name (e.g. "Galactipedians (UK)"), and update all links. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:16, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 7 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)
	The ~~biggest~~ reason I don't like Galactipedia is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only...~~if Wikipedia~~ itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For ~~instnace~~, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous
			:::::::::The only reason I don't like Galactipedia (otherwise its cute)is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchikers_guide] (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only if... wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instance, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 7 August 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)
			The biggest reason I don't like Galactipedia is because ideally I would like to see a merging of Wikipedia with all other wikis into a true "Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy" (Douglas Adams) which seems to of come out about the same time that Galactica came out, if and only...if Wikipedia itself was distributed (physically) and allowed more than one style. For instnace, I think its nuts that wikipedia has to have the same color scheme for all articles. [[User:Philpotomous\|Philpotomous]] 01:19, 7 August 2007 (CDT)Philpotomous

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 24 June 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			::::::::Sorry, was away for a few days. Thanks for offering anyway. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:30, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 21 June 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			:::::::Galactipedian it is. Catrope, honors? [[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 16:38, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 21 June 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::Galactipedian has my vote as well. Unfortunately, moving categories isn't possible (yet, there are [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8685 plans] do implement that in 1.11), so we'd need to delete the old cats, recreate them under a different name (e.g. "Galactipedians (UK)"), and update all links. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:16, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		::::Galactipedian has my vote as well. Unfortunately, moving categories isn't possible (yet, there are [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8685 plans] do implement that in 1.11), so we'd need to delete the old cats, recreate them under a different name (e.g. "Galactipedians (UK)"), and update all links. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:16, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
	:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)		:::::I like Galactipedian, too. Shouldn't be hard to work up a bot to reclassify that, I'd guess. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 10:51, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
			::::::Most of the categorylinks to Category:Wikipedians and friends are template-generated anyway. Just edit the template and you're almost done. It's really just a dozen of people who manually added the category to their user page. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:10, 21 June 2007 (CDT)