<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Category_talk:Former_Stargate_Cast_and_Crew/history?feed=atom</id>
	<title>Category talk:Former Stargate Cast and Crew - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Category_talk:Former_Stargate_Cast_and_Crew/history?feed=atom"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Category_talk:Former_Stargate_Cast_and_Crew/history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-14T23:34:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Former_Stargate_Cast_and_Crew&amp;diff=121737&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Tebici: explanation of append &quot;story-telling&quot; [style] to project page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Former_Stargate_Cast_and_Crew&amp;diff=121737&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-05-14T15:13:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;explanation of append &amp;quot;story-telling&amp;quot; [style] to project page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Changed &amp;quot;style&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;story-telling style.&amp;quot;  I daresay BSG probably owes something to the visual style of SG-1, which is ten years running and probably helped to popularize the use of a grittier and more contemporary visual style in space scifi as compared to a Star Trek or a Babylon 5 (earth-bound scifi is kind of a different story since much of it is in the very near future and admittedly SG-1 straddles the line between the two; see also: Space: Above and Beyond (1995)). In addition, SG-1 features the use of more &amp;quot;humble&amp;quot; technology by the primary team though paired with alien technology. Some of stylistic changes may have been as much a byproduct of the premise as an intentional leap forward in style but they may have been influential nonetheless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, the story-telling (if you can think of a better word, feel free) element is arguably what&amp;#039;s backed up by the citation. Anything more is at least debatable enough to fall more on the side of opinion than encyclopedic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tebici|Tebici]] 10:13, 14 May 2007 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tebici</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>