Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Successful requests - Revision history

Steelviper: + implicit votes

2006-06-30T15:27:02Z

+ implicit votes

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 30 June 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)		I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
	:Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT)		:Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
			::I suppose I also sort of had the implicit votes of both Spencerian (who nominated me) and Joe (who promoted me). It was just funny to see the one number that bumped down the average (which would otherwise have been a little above six) was mine. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:27, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Mercifull: /* Stats */

2006-06-30T15:13:12Z

Stats

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 30 June 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)		*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)
	I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)		I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
			:Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--[[User:Mercifull\|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull\|Contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Steelviper: + stats

2006-06-30T15:11:11Z

+ stats

New page

== Stats ==
Just thought I'd note some stats regarding successful admin nominations:
*Mean number of supports per successful nom: 5.5
*Number of opposes per successful num (mean, median... everything): 0
*Highest number of supports for successful nom: 7 (Mercifull)
*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)
I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)