Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Catrope - Revision history

Catrope: /* Minimum number of votes? */ community includes Joe

2007-07-29T22:15:56Z

Minimum number of votes?: community includes Joe

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 29 July 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	::Since Spence mentioned it... To be honest, I made it a point never to vote in RFAs, since I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide who is an administrator without any needling from me either way. This was borne out of the fact that I was the only bureaucrat for a while, and thus the one who would "knight" the administrator. That is, until the dawn of <S>the SS</s>... ahem I mean, Shane and Spence. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 23:23, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		::Since Spence mentioned it... To be honest, I made it a point never to vote in RFAs, since I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide who is an administrator without any needling from me either way. This was borne out of the fact that I was the only bureaucrat for a while, and thus the one who would "knight" the administrator. That is, until the dawn of <S>the SS</s>... ahem I mean, Shane and Spence. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 23:23, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			::::''I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide''
			:::You're part of the community too, Joe, and I for one welcome your vote (not just in RFAs, anything, really) as much as anyone else's. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 17:15, 29 July 2007 (CDT)

	== Who's allowed to vote? ==		== Who's allowed to vote? ==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Minimum number of votes? */ adding 2 cubits

2007-07-24T04:23:44Z

Minimum number of votes?: adding 2 cubits

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 24 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			::Since Spence mentioned it... To be honest, I made it a point never to vote in RFAs, since I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide who is an administrator without any needling from me either way. This was borne out of the fact that I was the only bureaucrat for a while, and thus the one who would "knight" the administrator. That is, until the dawn of <S>the SS</s>... ahem I mean, Shane and Spence. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 23:23, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

	== Who's allowed to vote? ==		== Who's allowed to vote? ==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Who's allowed to vote? */ reply

2007-07-23T17:37:35Z

Who's allowed to vote?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 23 July 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			: See [[BW:RFA]]. Basically, after 30 days, anyone can vote. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 12:37, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Veepz: Who's allowed to vote

2007-07-23T17:35:22Z

Who's allowed to vote

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 23 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

			== Who's allowed to vote? ==

			Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--[[User:Veepz\|Veepz]] 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Minimum number of votes? */ +comment

2007-07-23T17:13:50Z

Minimum number of votes?: +comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 23 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Minimum number of votes? */ reply

2007-07-23T13:51:45Z

Minimum number of votes?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 23 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Serenity: /* Minimum number of votes? */

2007-07-23T13:16:56Z

Minimum number of votes?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 23 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Minimum number of votes? ==		== Minimum number of votes? ==
	Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --[[User:Catrope\|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope\|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope\|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Catrope: Minimum number of votes?

2007-07-23T13:05:13Z

Minimum number of votes?

New page

== Minimum number of votes? ==
Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 23 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
	:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)		:Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
			::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)