Battlestar Wiki talk:Original Series Article Development Project - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "geocities.com" to "geocities.ws"

2021-10-27T17:23:01Z

Text replacement - "geocities.com" to "geocities.ws"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 27 October 2021
Line 47:		Line 47:

	I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)		I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)
	:Cool. I've read about stuff like that [http://www.geocities.~~com~~/sjpaxton/newpage5.html elsewhere], but never had enough official source to cite back on it. I think it'd add another texture/flavor (in RDM's parlance) to the TOS stuff, since we won't have any more episodes to draw on. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 5 January 2007 (CST)		:Cool. I've read about stuff like that [http://www.geocities.ws/sjpaxton/newpage5.html elsewhere], but never had enough official source to cite back on it. I think it'd add another texture/flavor (in RDM's parlance) to the TOS stuff, since we won't have any more episodes to draw on. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 5 January 2007 (CST)

	== Pace ==		== Pace ==

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:36Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	So why were the strikeouts hanged to HTML? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 07:13, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		So why were the strikeouts hanged to HTML? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 07:13, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	::Using templates for simple markup reduces portability of our content to other wikis, since they would also have to carry over whatever formatting templates we use. The <nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> tags are perfectly legal wiki code, even if they also happen to resemble their corresponding HTML tags. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 10:50, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		::Using templates for simple markup reduces portability of our content to other wikis, since they would also have to carry over whatever formatting templates we use. The <nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> tags are perfectly legal wiki code, even if they also happen to resemble their corresponding HTML tags. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 10:50, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::Sorry but I stil don't understand what you did because it is against BG S & C. Would another admin , SV?, like to comment? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 12:31, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		:::Sorry but I stil don't understand what you did because it is against BG S & C. Would another admin , SV?, like to comment? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 12:31, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	::::<nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> can be restyled just as easily as templates, using CSS. If you're referring to the edits I made to other user's talk entries, they weren't to substantive content, and enabled the deprecated templates to be removed without damaging the readability of their posts. I don't think it's much different that adjusting indentation, but naturally I apologize to SV if he felt slighted. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 18:04, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		::::<nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> can be restyled just as easily as templates, using CSS. If you're referring to the edits I made to other user's talk entries, they weren't to substantive content, and enabled the deprecated templates to be removed without damaging the readability of their posts. I don't think it's much different that adjusting indentation, but naturally I apologize to SV if he felt slighted. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 18:04, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::::I didn't feel slighted in the least (and if I did, I hope I'd drop a note on your talk page). I'm just a template junky, and knew about the "s" template, and knew something of the "wiki trumps html". I '''didn't''' see the discussion over at S&C about portability, and having seen it, I agree completely. (If you just copy and pasted entries with the s template, it would be broken on another board). Ultimately , the "s" template (R.I.P.) didn't really save much time over the strike/del/etc. tags, and strike is valid XHTML. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 20:15, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::I didn't feel slighted in the least (and if I did, I hope I'd drop a note on your talk page). I'm just a template junky, and knew about the "s" template, and knew something of the "wiki trumps html". I '''didn't''' see the discussion over at S&C about portability, and having seen it, I agree completely. (If you just copy and pasted entries with the s template, it would be broken on another board). Ultimately , the "s" template (R.I.P.) didn't really save much time over the strike/del/etc. tags, and strike is valid XHTML. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 20:15, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

Spencerian: /* Unmagnificent Warriors... */

2007-06-02T20:29:37Z

Unmagnificent Warriors...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 2 June 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)		I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	:I'm glad I'm not the only one who has trouble with these discs. I don't think I'm particularly hard on them, but they seem to scratch more easily than others. I finished up the requested articles for that one, and will probably switch the "featured episode" to The Young Lords on Monday. Though it looks like it might just need a pic of Adama's quarters... I may go ahead an grab a shot of that today. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)		:I'm glad I'm not the only one who has trouble with these discs. I don't think I'm particularly hard on them, but they seem to scratch more easily than others. I finished up the requested articles for that one, and will probably switch the "featured episode" to The Young Lords on Monday. Though it looks like it might just need a pic of Adama's quarters... I may go ahead an grab a shot of that today. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
			::Ditto. There was a manufacturing flaw with these things for everyone I've read about. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:29, 2 June 2007 (CDT)

Steelviper: /* Unmagnificent Warriors... */ stupid discs

2007-06-02T19:03:06Z

Unmagnificent Warriors...: stupid discs

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 2 June 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:

	I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)		I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)
			:I'm glad I'm not the only one who has trouble with these discs. I don't think I'm particularly hard on them, but they seem to scratch more easily than others. I finished up the requested articles for that one, and will probably switch the "featured episode" to The Young Lords on Monday. Though it looks like it might just need a pic of Adama's quarters... I may go ahead an grab a shot of that today. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Unmagnificent Warriors...

2007-01-26T03:30:57Z

Unmagnificent Warriors...

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 26 January 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:
	Is the "pace" of the featured episodes moving too slowly (or too quickly) for anyone? Joe seems to be getting out ahead, but I don't have a good feel for everybody else. I was planning on switching them out roughly once a week (as I planned on actually sitting down and watching the featured episode once a week), but it's just meant as an organizational tool. If we want to slide it up to or increase the pace, let me know (or edit the "featured episode" subpage). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:23, 9 January 2007 (CST)		Is the "pace" of the featured episodes moving too slowly (or too quickly) for anyone? Joe seems to be getting out ahead, but I don't have a good feel for everybody else. I was planning on switching them out roughly once a week (as I planned on actually sitting down and watching the featured episode once a week), but it's just meant as an organizational tool. If we want to slide it up to or increase the pace, let me know (or edit the "featured episode" subpage). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:23, 9 January 2007 (CST)
	: I'm more or less adding articles and images right now. Later, I intend to go through and add audio clips, but that takes me a little while longer, so I wait for a rainy day to do that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:42, 9 January 2007 (CST)		: I'm more or less adding articles and images right now. Later, I intend to go through and add audio clips, but that takes me a little while longer, so I wait for a rainy day to do that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:42, 9 January 2007 (CST)

			== Unmagnificent Warriors... ==

			I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: /* Pace */ reply

2007-01-10T02:42:14Z

Pace: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:42, 10 January 2007
Line 51:		Line 51:
	== Pace ==		== Pace ==
	Is the "pace" of the featured episodes moving too slowly (or too quickly) for anyone? Joe seems to be getting out ahead, but I don't have a good feel for everybody else. I was planning on switching them out roughly once a week (as I planned on actually sitting down and watching the featured episode once a week), but it's just meant as an organizational tool. If we want to slide it up to or increase the pace, let me know (or edit the "featured episode" subpage). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:23, 9 January 2007 (CST)		Is the "pace" of the featured episodes moving too slowly (or too quickly) for anyone? Joe seems to be getting out ahead, but I don't have a good feel for everybody else. I was planning on switching them out roughly once a week (as I planned on actually sitting down and watching the featured episode once a week), but it's just meant as an organizational tool. If we want to slide it up to or increase the pace, let me know (or edit the "featured episode" subpage). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:23, 9 January 2007 (CST)
			: I'm more or less adding articles and images right now. Later, I intend to go through and add audio clips, but that takes me a little while longer, so I wait for a rainy day to do that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 20:42, 9 January 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Subproject */ pace?

2007-01-09T16:23:49Z

Subproject: pace?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 9 January 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:
	I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)		I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)
	:Cool. I've read about stuff like that [http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/newpage5.html elsewhere], but never had enough official source to cite back on it. I think it'd add another texture/flavor (in RDM's parlance) to the TOS stuff, since we won't have any more episodes to draw on. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 5 January 2007 (CST)		:Cool. I've read about stuff like that [http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/newpage5.html elsewhere], but never had enough official source to cite back on it. I think it'd add another texture/flavor (in RDM's parlance) to the TOS stuff, since we won't have any more episodes to draw on. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 5 January 2007 (CST)

			== Pace ==
			Is the "pace" of the featured episodes moving too slowly (or too quickly) for anyone? Joe seems to be getting out ahead, but I don't have a good feel for everybody else. I was planning on switching them out roughly once a week (as I planned on actually sitting down and watching the featured episode once a week), but it's just meant as an organizational tool. If we want to slide it up to or increase the pace, let me know (or edit the "featured episode" subpage). --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 10:23, 9 January 2007 (CST)

Steelviper: /* Timeline for feature, etc. */ phase II

2007-01-05T13:15:04Z

Timeline for feature, etc.: phase II

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 5 January 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:
	:If there are no objections I'll switch the featured episode to "Lost Planet, I" tomorrow sometime. Joe's already gotten a good start on it, and I think most single episodes will go quicker than Saga did. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:49, 4 January 2007 (CST)		:If there are no objections I'll switch the featured episode to "Lost Planet, I" tomorrow sometime. Joe's already gotten a good start on it, and I think most single episodes will go quicker than Saga did. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:49, 4 January 2007 (CST)
	:: I'm cool with that. After we're done with the episodes, we probably want to go through print publications and enter in comments and other information into the necessary articles. But that's more of a "phase 2" sort of thing, IMO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:52, 4 January 2007 (CST)		:: I'm cool with that. After we're done with the episodes, we probably want to go through print publications and enter in comments and other information into the necessary articles. But that's more of a "phase 2" sort of thing, IMO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:52, 4 January 2007 (CST)
			:::Sounds good. I was figuring a rate of roughly an episode per week, which would project out to several months actually. Maybe that's slow, but once the podcasts start rolling again that eats up most of my BSG/wiki time. I don't have much in the way of print materials on TOS (and there are [http://www.chrispappas.com/archives/registry.html plenty] out there, but I'll do what I can. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:15, 5 January 2007 (CST)

	== Subproject ==		== Subproject ==

Steelviper: /* Subproject */ neat...

2007-01-05T13:11:12Z

Subproject: neat...

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 5 January 2007
Line 46:		Line 46:

	I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)		I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)
			:Cool. I've read about stuff like that [http://www.geocities.com/sjpaxton/newpage5.html elsewhere], but never had enough official source to cite back on it. I think it'd add another texture/flavor (in RDM's parlance) to the TOS stuff, since we won't have any more episodes to draw on. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 5 January 2007 (CST)

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Subproject

2007-01-05T01:05:29Z

Subproject

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 5 January 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:
	:If there are no objections I'll switch the featured episode to "Lost Planet, I" tomorrow sometime. Joe's already gotten a good start on it, and I think most single episodes will go quicker than Saga did. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:49, 4 January 2007 (CST)		:If there are no objections I'll switch the featured episode to "Lost Planet, I" tomorrow sometime. Joe's already gotten a good start on it, and I think most single episodes will go quicker than Saga did. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 13:49, 4 January 2007 (CST)
	:: I'm cool with that. After we're done with the episodes, we probably want to go through print publications and enter in comments and other information into the necessary articles. But that's more of a "phase 2" sort of thing, IMO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:52, 4 January 2007 (CST)		:: I'm cool with that. After we're done with the episodes, we probably want to go through print publications and enter in comments and other information into the necessary articles. But that's more of a "phase 2" sort of thing, IMO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:52, 4 January 2007 (CST)

			== Subproject ==

			I have copies of unproduced and previous versions of ''Battlestar Galactica'' scripts for the old series. After this project comes near completion, which I imagine won't be for at least a month, I would very much like to go through the scripts and add content to the wiki based off them (obviously, they wouldn't be necessarily reflect as "canonical", but they are far more interesting than tie-in novels and the like, IMO). Just wanted to see what everyone thoughts on this are... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:05, 4 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	So why were the strikeouts hanged to HTML? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 07:13, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		So why were the strikeouts hanged to HTML? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 07:13, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	::Using templates for simple markup reduces portability of our content to other wikis, since they would also have to carry over whatever formatting templates we use. The <nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> tags are perfectly legal wiki code, even if they also happen to resemble their corresponding HTML tags. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 10:50, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		::Using templates for simple markup reduces portability of our content to other wikis, since they would also have to carry over whatever formatting templates we use. The <nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> tags are perfectly legal wiki code, even if they also happen to resemble their corresponding HTML tags. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 10:50, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::Sorry but I stil don't understand what you did because it is against BG S & C. Would another admin , SV?, like to comment? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 12:31, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		:::Sorry but I stil don't understand what you did because it is against BG S & C. Would another admin , SV?, like to comment? --[[User:Grafix\|Grafix]] 12:31, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	::::<nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> can be restyled just as easily as templates, using CSS. If you're referring to the edits I made to other user's talk entries, they weren't to substantive content, and enabled the deprecated templates to be removed without damaging the readability of their posts. I don't think it's much different that adjusting indentation, but naturally I apologize to SV if he felt slighted. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 18:04, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		::::<nowiki><del></nowiki> and <nowiki><u></nowiki> can be restyled just as easily as templates, using CSS. If you're referring to the edits I made to other user's talk entries, they weren't to substantive content, and enabled the deprecated templates to be removed without damaging the readability of their posts. I don't think it's much different that adjusting indentation, but naturally I apologize to SV if he felt slighted. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 18:04, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

	:::::I didn't feel slighted in the least (and if I did, I hope I'd drop a note on your talk page). I'm just a template junky, and knew about the "s" template, and knew something of the "wiki trumps html". I '''didn't''' see the discussion over at S&C about portability, and having seen it, I agree completely. (If you just copy and pasted entries with the s template, it would be broken on another board). Ultimately , the "s" template (R.I.P.) didn't really save much time over the strike/del/etc. tags, and strike is valid XHTML. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 20:15, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		:::::I didn't feel slighted in the least (and if I did, I hope I'd drop a note on your talk page). I'm just a template junky, and knew about the "s" template, and knew something of the "wiki trumps html". I '''didn't''' see the discussion over at S&C about portability, and having seen it, I agree completely. (If you just copy and pasted entries with the s template, it would be broken on another board). Ultimately , the "s" template (R.I.P.) didn't really save much time over the strike/del/etc. tags, and strike is valid XHTML. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 20:15, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 2 June 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)		I'm not able to do this episode since I'm having problems with that particular disc, which is painfully aggravating to me... Ah well. Working on The Young Lords now. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 21:30, 25 January 2007 (CST)
	:I'm glad I'm not the only one who has trouble with these discs. I don't think I'm particularly hard on them, but they seem to scratch more easily than others. I finished up the requested articles for that one, and will probably switch the "featured episode" to The Young Lords on Monday. Though it looks like it might just need a pic of Adama's quarters... I may go ahead an grab a shot of that today. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)		:I'm glad I'm not the only one who has trouble with these discs. I don't think I'm particularly hard on them, but they seem to scratch more easily than others. I finished up the requested articles for that one, and will probably switch the "featured episode" to The Young Lords on Monday. Though it looks like it might just need a pic of Adama's quarters... I may go ahead an grab a shot of that today. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 14:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
			::Ditto. There was a manufacturing flaw with these things for everyone I've read about. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 15:29, 2 June 2007 (CDT)