Battlestar Wiki talk:Future of the wiki - Revision history

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */ other complement

2016-02-21T14:52:23Z

Future: other complement

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 21 February 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. I know what I'm talking about as I run my own home server for s semantic wiki about ''Stargate'' with 6 years old PC on Linux. It's working and it is accessible everywhere in the world, limited only by my private DSL bandwidth. This is a very chip server as it cost only for me the electricity to power it. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:52, 21 February 2016 (EST)

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */ complement

2016-02-21T14:45:27Z

Future: complement

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 21 February 2016
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different ~~way~~ with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host without any support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */ reply

2016-02-21T14:16:43Z

Future: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 21 February 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
			:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host without any support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)

BlueResistance: /* Future */

2016-02-21T14:02:53Z

Future

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 21 February 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)

BlueResistance: /* Future */ Donate or sell?

2016-02-21T14:02:31Z

Future: Donate or sell?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 21 February 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
			:::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */

2016-02-21T04:49:14Z

Future

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 21 February 2016
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */ reply

2016-02-21T04:45:00Z

Future: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 21 February 2016
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
			:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)

CylonU87: /* Future */

2016-02-20T21:11:20Z

Future

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 20 February 2016
Line 38:		Line 38:
	:::::And the Battlestar Wiki:News/Airdates page cannot be edited now. -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 16:29, 30 November 2014 (EST)		:::::And the Battlestar Wiki:News/Airdates page cannot be edited now. -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 16:29, 30 November 2014 (EST)
	:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)
			::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)

LIMAFOX76: /* Future */ French wiki

2016-02-20T18:13:46Z

Future: French wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 20 February 2016
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:::::And the Battlestar Wiki:News/Airdates page cannot be edited now. -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 16:29, 30 November 2014 (EST)		:::::And the Battlestar Wiki:News/Airdates page cannot be edited now. -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 16:29, 30 November 2014 (EST)
			:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)

CylonU87: moved Talk:BSG Wiki to Battlestar Wiki talk:Future of the wiki: This does not belong in mainspace.

2016-02-20T16:46:02Z

moved Talk:BSG Wiki to Battlestar Wiki talk:Future of the wiki: This does not belong in mainspace.

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:46, 20 February 2016
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 21 February 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. I know what I'm talking about as I run my own home server for s semantic wiki about ''Stargate'' with 6 years old PC on Linux. It's working and it is accessible everywhere in the world, limited only by my private DSL bandwidth. This is a very chip server as it cost only for me the electricity to power it. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:52, 21 February 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 21 February 2016
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::: For the record, I started over a new French semantic wiki about BSG. You can find it at http://battlestar.wiki/. For the moment it doesn't have a lot of articles yet the semantic works well and I updated the look using the Vector skin to fit BSG look with a bit of modernity. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 13:13, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different ~~way~~ with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Joe by different ways with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host without any support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving or selling the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host (may be less ambitious and less costly of course) without any major support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 21 February 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)
			:::::::::: Actually it's not an issue about giving the "keys" to a thrustworthy person. I think Joe is wise enough to find somebody of this kind. No the issue is the wiki host server itself that cost money every month. As I read on Facebook it's about of "giving" to this person all databases and pictures, and let him put all of them on another host without any support of frakmedia (if it still exist). So it's more complicated than only giving the host server's passwords. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 09:16, 21 February 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 21 February 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)		::::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 21 February 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)		::::::: I see no end to this. Forking a project when the original project stalls is not a good idea. There were more than 2000 articles on the french wiki here. Do you want to rewrite all that? Surely there must be a better way. Looks like Joe is really busy with work and family. So, its not his fault. -- [[User:CylonU87\|CylonU87]] <sup>[[User talk:CylonU87\|I don't feel like a copy.]]</sup> 16:11, 20 February 2016 (EST)
	:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)		:::::::: There weren't 2000 but only 450 articles when the wiki worked well. I know it because many of them have been written by myself. 4 years ago the wiki lost all its articles but two. The database has been corrupted and nothing get better since. I tried to reach Jo by different way with no success. So one does need a way to try to revive the wiki. I found this one. It's working well and I can retreive all th written stuff on Archive.org. I don't blame Joe as I do have a family too and a job. But as you may already know on Facebook, Joe declared that he was planning to move on. --[[User:LIMAFOX76\|LIMAFOX76]] 23:44, 20 February 2016 (EST)
			:::::::: Do you know if anyone has ever suggested to Joe that he donate or sell control of the website to someone else? -- [[User:BlueResistance\|BlueResistance]] 09:02, 21 February 2016 (EST)