<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Battlestar_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Standards/history?feed=atom</id>
	<title>Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/Standards - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Battlestar_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Standards/history?feed=atom"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/Battlestar_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Standards/history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-25T10:08:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Battlestar_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Standards&amp;diff=19787&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Joe Beaudoin Jr.: creating subpage to RFA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Battlestar_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Standards&amp;diff=19787&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2005-12-16T05:16:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;creating subpage to RFA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The following is a list of standards that can be applied to a nominee seeing [[BW:RFA|adminship]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Quality&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of edits.  Some people, such as those on Wikipedia, determine a potential adminstrator&amp;#039;s work by the quantity of edits.  However, since Battlestar Wiki is concentrated on a specific topic (i.e. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Battlestar Galactica&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), quality of an article is weighted more than the quantity of an edit.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Civility&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.  Generally, an adminstrator is the &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; of Battlestar Wiki and is held under high regard by the rest of the community.  So the questions that may arise to confirm or deny the nominee&amp;#039;s civility may include the following: Does the nominee in question demonstrate an open mind?  Has there been a difficult situation that the nominee has had to face?  If so, how did the nominee deal with the situation?  Was it dealt with in an amicable fashion?  &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Level-headedness&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.  While civility is key, there is also the intellectual portion that must be assessed by the voters.  Is the nominee impulsive?  Does the nominee talk things through using the discussion/talk pages? &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Length of time contributing&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.  It is believed that time spent on the wiki is a factor. To some, the length of time the user has spent contributing to Battlestar Wiki determines his or her dedication -- not only as a contributor, but also as a potential admin.&lt;br /&gt;
** There is also the sub-issue of the potential user&amp;#039;s consistent use of Battlestar Wiki.  Is the user infrequent or does the user consistently contribute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actions on other Wikis (i.e. Wikipedia) may also be factored in -- however experience on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Battlestar Wiki&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a prerequisite for adminship.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Joe Beaudoin Jr.</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>