Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for July 2006 - Revision history

Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

2020-04-11T01:54:28Z

Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==[[Act of Contrition]]==		==[[Act of Contrition]]==

	*I don't think episode guides are the best thing to feature on the main page, generally. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:35, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		*I don't think episode guides are the best thing to feature on the main page, generally. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:35, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
	::While I agree that episode guides aren't nearly as cool as our straight-up articles, I know that the episode guides are what originally brought me here in the first place (and are a major hub during on-season). I was just hoping that through the FA process we could find an outstanding example, further refine it, and have a model that the other episode guides could aspire to. I'm not sure if it's this one, though. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 7 July 2006 (CDT)		::While I agree that episode guides aren't nearly as cool as our straight-up articles, I know that the episode guides are what originally brought me here in the first place (and are a major hub during on-season). I was just hoping that through the FA process we could find an outstanding example, further refine it, and have a model that the other episode guides could aspire to. I'm not sure if it's this one, though. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:11, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
	:::I am planning on proposing an episode article standardization project in the [[Battlestar wiki:Think Tank]] where we do exactly what SV has proposed. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 10:36, 7 July 2006 (CDT)		:::I am planning on proposing an episode article standardization project in the [[Battlestar wiki:Think Tank]] where we do exactly what SV has proposed. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 10:36, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==[[History of the Twelve Colonies]]==		==[[History of the Twelve Colonies]]==
	*{{support}}This was originally one of my pet projects, although it's benefited from other users' contributions. I think it's a good example of a well-cited article that makes educated speculation without getting carried away, covers a broad range of interesting topics, and is written in a crisp and concise manner. --[[User:~~Peter Farago~~\|~~Peter Farago~~]] 21:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		*{{support}}This was originally one of my pet projects, although it's benefited from other users' contributions. I think it's a good example of a well-cited article that makes educated speculation without getting carried away, covers a broad range of interesting topics, and is written in a crisp and concise manner. --[[User:April Arcus\|April Arcus]] 21:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
	*{{support}}On second thought I vote for this one: labored many an hour on it (I am something of a Timelord...)--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 22:16, 6 July 2006 (CDT)		*{{support}}On second thought I vote for this one: labored many an hour on it (I am something of a Timelord...)--[[User:The Merovingian\|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian\|E]])</sup> 22:16, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
	::A fine article, but is there any way we could find a relevant picture to brighten things up? Otherwise it seems to fit the criteria. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:16, 7 July 2006 (CDT)		::A fine article, but is there any way we could find a relevant picture to brighten things up? Otherwise it seems to fit the criteria. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 07:16, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
	{{support}} Changing from neutral to support now that it meets all the FA Criteria. One more pic wouldn't hurt, maybe, and I'm sure some other edits may come along, but it's clean enough in its current state to be a FA in my opinion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:24, 7 July 2006 (CDT)<br/>		{{support}} Changing from neutral to support now that it meets all the FA Criteria. One more pic wouldn't hurt, maybe, and I'm sure some other edits may come along, but it's clean enough in its current state to be a FA in my opinion. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 09:24, 7 July 2006 (CDT)<br/>
	{{support}} Nice, concise article. Probably could used another image per SV. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 10:39, 7 July 2006 (CDT)		{{support}} Nice, concise article. Probably could used another image per SV. --[[User:Gougef\|FrankieG]] 10:39, 7 July 2006 (CDT)

Shane at 14:20, 28 August 2006

2006-08-28T14:20:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 28 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| start = July 7, 2006		\| start = July 7, 2006
	\| end = June 10, 2006		\| end = June 10, 2006
	\|}}		}}

	=Notice=		=Notice=
	This is a heads up for a 24 hour notice before the objects get rotated and next month gets put in the place. Vote now. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:42, 10 July 2006 (CDT)		This is a heads up for a 24 hour notice before the objects get rotated and next month gets put in the place. Vote now. --[[User:Shane\|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane\|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane\|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane\|E]])</sup> 20:42, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

Shane at 14:28, 8 August 2006

2006-08-08T14:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 8 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{archive-message		{{archive-message
	~~\| pagename = Debate for June 2006~~
	\| start = July 7, 2006		\| start = July 7, 2006
	\| end = June 10, 2006		\| end = June 10, 2006

Shane at 15:20, 13 July 2006

2006-07-13T15:20:49Z

New page

{{archive-message
| pagename = Debate for June 2006
| start = July 7, 2006
| end = June 10, 2006
|}}

=Notice=
This is a heads up for a 24 hour notice before the objects get rotated and next month gets put in the place. Vote now. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]]) 20:42, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

=Candidates=

==[[Colonial One]]==

==[[Act of Contrition]]==

*I don't think episode guides are the best thing to feature on the main page, generally. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
::While I agree that episode guides aren't nearly as cool as our straight-up articles, I know that the episode guides are what originally brought me here in the first place (and are a major hub during on-season). I was just hoping that through the FA process we could find an outstanding example, further refine it, and have a model that the other episode guides could aspire to. I'm not sure if it's this one, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:11, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
:::I am planning on proposing an episode article standardization project in the [[Battlestar wiki:Think Tank]] where we do exactly what SV has proposed. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:36, 7 July 2006 (CDT)

==[[Tricia Helfer]]==

*{{Support}} - Well Sourced --[[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]]) 20:37, 10 July 2006 (CDT)

==[[History of the Twelve Colonies]]==
*{{support}}This was originally one of my pet projects, although it's benefited from other users' contributions. I think it's a good example of a well-cited article that makes educated speculation without getting carried away, covers a broad range of interesting topics, and is written in a crisp and concise manner. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
*{{support}}On second thought I vote for this one: labored many an hour on it (I am something of a Timelord...)--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] ([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]]) 22:16, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
::A fine article, but is there any way we could find a relevant picture to brighten things up? Otherwise it seems to fit the criteria. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:16, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
{{support}} Changing from neutral to support now that it meets all the FA Criteria. One more pic wouldn't hurt, maybe, and I'm sure some other edits may come along, but it's clean enough in its current state to be a FA in my opinion. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:24, 7 July 2006 (CDT) 
{{support}} Nice, concise article. Probably could used another image per SV. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:39, 7 July 2006 (CDT)