Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for December 2006 - Revision history

Steelviper: Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Current Debate moved to Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for December 2006: created archive

2006-12-21T15:00:16Z

Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Current Debate moved to Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for December 2006: created archive

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:00, 21 December 2006
(No difference)

BklynBruzer: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */

2006-12-21T14:51:22Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 21 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
	:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)		:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)
	::::sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)		:::: sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */

2006-12-21T14:50:54Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 21 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
	:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)		:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)
			::::sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)

Spencerian: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */

2006-12-21T01:34:23Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 21 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
			:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer at 01:19, 21 December 2006

2006-12-21T01:19:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 21 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Flashlight==		==Flashlight==
	*{{support}}. Brilliance. Sheer frakking brilliance.		*{{support}}. Brilliance. Sheer frakking brilliance. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 19:19, 20 December 2006 (CST)

	==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==		==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==

Steelviper: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */ FA?

2006-12-18T22:15:48Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies: FA?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 18 December 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)		***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)
			::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)

Spencerian: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */

2006-12-12T13:32:30Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 12 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	** C'mon, try and honestly tell me you don't find Flashlight or Toaster to be frakking hilarious. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 22:38, 11 December 2006 (CST)		** C'mon, try and honestly tell me you don't find Flashlight or Toaster to be frakking hilarious. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 22:38, 11 December 2006 (CST)
			***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer: /* Religion in the Twelve Colonies */

2006-12-12T04:38:42Z

Religion in the Twelve Colonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 12 December 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==		==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==
	* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)
			** C'mon, try and honestly tell me you don't find Flashlight or Toaster to be frakking hilarious. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 22:38, 11 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer: /* Flashlight */

2006-12-09T05:53:19Z

Flashlight

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 9 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Flashlight==		==Flashlight==
	{{support}} Brilliance. Sheer frakking brilliance.		*{{support}}. Brilliance. Sheer frakking brilliance.

	==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==		==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==
	* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)

BklynBruzer: /* Voting */

2006-12-09T05:51:57Z

Voting

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 9 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~Voting~~==		==Flashlight==
			{{support}} Brilliance. Sheer frakking brilliance.

	==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==		==Religion in the Twelve Colonies==
	* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 21 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
	:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)		:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)
	::::sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)		:::: sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 21 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
	:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)		:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)
			::::sigh Maybe one of my candidates will get it next month. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 08:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 21 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)		::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)
			:::Please do! --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:34, 20 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 18 December 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)		***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)
			::Uh... should I go ahead and kick in the "FA" busywork for this article? A 2-1 margin isn't quite as large as I'd hope for, but January rapidly approaches. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 16:15, 18 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 12 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. The article is informative and has a nice balance of images to text. All the other articles are too text heavy or are silly pages (which REALLY have to excel to be a featured article since they aren't necessarily canonical or germane). --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 14:59, 8 December 2006 (CST)
	** C'mon, try and honestly tell me you don't find Flashlight or Toaster to be frakking hilarious. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 22:38, 11 December 2006 (CST)		** C'mon, try and honestly tell me you don't find Flashlight or Toaster to be frakking hilarious. --[[User:BklynBruzer\|BklynBruzer]] 22:38, 11 December 2006 (CST)
			***I do. I was the initial "author" for both articles in their current form. But we have so many articles that have genuine content that deserve mention, and not just because they are funny. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 07:32, 12 December 2006 (CST)
	* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)		* {{support}}. This is a support contingent on finding another image or two for this article. As it stands there are only images in one section, so it lacks visual appeal. I don't want to see anything outrageous, just a couple of relevent screencaps. --[[User:Steelviper\|Steelviper]] 15:07, 8 December 2006 (CST)