Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad/pt:Battlestar Wiki:Guerra das Citações - Revision history

Syrin at 14:07, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T14:07:52Z

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 A ''Especulação'' baseia-se nas atitudes ou afirmações das personagens para explicar as suas motivações ou a direcção possível da trama. No caso de falta de informação de fontes oficiais, pode contribuir para a reflexão e discussão sobre os assuntos apresentados num artigo, quando devidamente apresentada e justificada.
-A especulação é a única fonte de informação para conteúdos relativos à [[Original Séries/pt:Galactica (TOS)|Série Original]], visto que há poucas fontes oficiais disponíveis para consulta ou pesquisa desde que a série terminou.
+A especulação é a única fonte de informação para conteúdos relativos à [[Original Séries/pt:Battlestar Galactica (TOS)|Série Original]], visto que há poucas fontes oficiais disponíveis para consulta ou pesquisa desde que a série terminou.
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
-===Special considerations in using derived content===
+===Notas sobre o uso de conteúdo derivado===
-Using either plausible speculation or logical deduction methods require all contributors to cite '''credible official sources that support their speculation or deduction.''' Be sure to use footnote templates or the Sources namespace (see later sections) to add in the references that support your hypotheses.
+A especulação e dedução lógica pressupõem uma confirmação das fontes usadas, e devem evitar o [[BW:FANW/pt:fanwanking|fanwanking]]. Os artigos que não cumpram as regras de citação de fontes oficiais devem ser reformulados para evitar a sua eliminação.
-===Footnote Templates===
+===Templates para Notas de Rodapé===
-Battlestar Wiki supports the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script for the purpose of making footnotes where in-text citations become too cumbersome. This is the preferred way of citing sources. If you use this method, please make sure the <code><nowiki><references/></nowiki></code> tag is flanked like so: <code><nowiki><div style="font-size:85%"><references/></div></nowiki></code>. In addition to using the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script, all citations are to be in proper format. [[:Category:Citation templates|Citation templates]] have been imported from ''Wikipedia'' to help. Please review the template pages to understand how they are used. These templates should be placed within the <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> tags.
+Na Battlestar Wiki deve ser usado o código [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] para citações.
+Ex: <code><nowiki><div style="font-size:85%"><references/></div></nowiki></code>
-In the past, we have used <nowiki>{{ref}} and {{note}}</nowiki> (imported from Wikipedia) for this purpose. They have been removed from the system. Please see [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script for examples on how to use the new tags.
+A formatação das citações deve seguir o template: [[:Category:Citation templates/pt:Template Citação|Template Citação]], colocando-se dentro das tags <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code>.

Syrin at 14:04, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T14:04:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 27 December 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:


	A ordem pode ser alterada quando existir informação comprovada de fontes especializadas. Factos apresentados nos episódios têm precedência aos comentários dos produtores; os erros de filmagens e bloopers devem ser ignorados		A ordem pode ser alterada quando existir informação comprovada de fontes especializadas. Factos apresentados nos episódios têm precedência aos comentários dos produtores; os erros de filmagens e bloopers devem ser ignorados.

	Caso um comentário venha a ser desmentido em informações posteriores, dá-se prevalência à informação actual, deixando uma nota na página [[Continuity errors (RDM)/pt:Erros de Continuidade (RDM)\|Erros de Continuidade (RDM)]].		Caso um comentário venha a ser desmentido em informações posteriores, dá-se prevalência à informação actual, deixando uma nota na página [[Continuity errors (RDM)/pt:Erros de Continuidade (RDM)\|Erros de Continuidade (RDM)]].
Line 41:		Line 41:
	'''Lista de fontes não fiáveis''		'''Lista de fontes não fiáveis''
	*'''Battlestar Wiki'''. Qualquer informação que não tenha sido confirmada pessoalmente pode não ser fidedigna.		*'''Battlestar Wiki'''. Qualquer informação que não tenha sido confirmada pessoalmente pode não ser fidedigna.
	** Excepto as informações fornecidas pelas '''Sources:''' e comentários do elenco ou equipa nos [[BW:~~OC\|Official Communiques/pt~~:BW:OC\|~~Comunidados~~ Oficiais]]		** Excepto as informações fornecidas pelas '''Sources:''' e comentários do elenco ou equipa nos [[BW:OCpt:BW:OC\|Comunicados Oficiais]]
	*'''[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia].''' Sempre que a informação não for devidamente citada.		*'''[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia].''' Sempre que a informação não for devidamente citada.
	*'''[http://www.imdb.com/ IMDB]'''. Sempre que a informação não for devidamente confirmada.		*'''[http://www.imdb.com/ IMDB]'''. Sempre que a informação não for devidamente confirmada.
Line 50:		Line 50:


	==~~Our Weapons~~==		==As nossas armas==

	===~~Derived Content~~===		===Conteúdo Derivado===

	Battlestar Wiki ~~is an encyclopedia on works of fiction. As with all fiction~~, ~~the characters, technology~~, ~~events and other items in ''Battlestar Galactica'' are never fully explained or defined~~. ~~Because of this~~, ~~contributors are allowed to add material that helps in adding intriguing interpretation and explanation into an article's content~~, ~~provided that the addition is based on logical or actual events~~, ~~characters, and objects from official sources~~. ~~We call this~~ ''~~derived content~~''. ~~There are two forms contributors can use as appropriate~~: '''~~plausible speculation~~''' ~~and~~ '''~~logical deduction~~'''.		A Battlestar Wiki é uma enciclopédia sobre obras ficcionais, onde as personagens, a tecnologia e os eventos nunca são devidamente explicados ou definidos. Por esta razão, é possível adicionar a um artigo informações que contribuam para a intriga, desde que baseado em eventos lógicos e actuais, personagens e afirmações de fontes oficiais. A isto chama-se ''conteúdo derivado''. Há duas formas de conteúdo derivado: '''especulação plausível''' e '''dedução lógica'''.

	~~====Plausible speculation====~~

	The ''plausible speculation'' method best works in filling the gaps of data on character motivation or plot direction based on the behaviors or motives expressed by any and all characters as appropriate. When done correctly, plausible speculations add "color" and insight to the article, as well as defining the article's content for readers who may not have realized a significance to the subject matter presented in the article.		====Especulação====

	Plausible speculation occurs when official sources on the subject are sparse, but substantially important events and results occur in the official sources that logical possibilities can be generated. Plausible speculations are ''~~highly~~'' ~~fluid and subject to extreme editing~~ as ~~new official information occurs~~. ~~Again~~, ~~'''plausible explanations lend themselves best to character behaviors and motivations~~.~~'''~~		A ''Especulação'' baseia-se nas atitudes ou afirmações das personagens para explicar as suas motivações ou a direcção possível da trama. No caso de falta de informação de fontes oficiais, pode contribuir para a reflexão e discussão sobre os assuntos apresentados num artigo, quando devidamente apresentada e justificada.
			A especulação é a única fonte de informação para conteúdos relativos à [[Original Séries/pt:Galactica (TOS)\|Série Original]], visto que há poucas fontes oficiais disponíveis para consulta ou pesquisa desde que a série terminou.

	One significant example of an article that uses a great deal of plausible speculation is the article on [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] and [[Case Orange]]. For contributors of [[Original Series]] content, plausible speculation is all that can be drawn upon on since the Original Series and its [[Galactica 1980\|spinoff]] have long ceased production, and there are very few official resources available to consult or research.

	====~~Logical deduction~~====		====Dedução Lógica====

			Para a ''Dedução Lógica'' contribui a informação disponível nas várias fontes oficiais, mesmo quando o assunto não seja directamente discutido numa mas sim em várias fontes.

	The second method is ''logical deduction''. The logical deduction approach differs from plausible speculation in that much more information is available from official content and sources to derive strongly supported article content, despite the fact that the subject matter ''per se'' may not be discussed in any one source, but over a series of sources. '''Logical deductions usually lend themselves best to explanations of technology, terminology or procedure, with technology that has been illustrated, although not fully explained.'''

	The subarticles in the [[Science in the Re-imagined Series]] parent article are good examples where logical deduction from sources gives greater insight and detail on a topic from the analysis of screenshots of displays, dialogue, scientific principles, and the like.

	===Special considerations in using derived content===		===Special considerations in using derived content===

Syrin at 13:59, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T13:59:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 27 December 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	#*Websites do elenco e da equipa		#*Websites do elenco e da equipa
	#*Entrevistas ao elenco e equipa feitas em convenções de Ficção Científica e da SciFi.com		#*Entrevistas ao elenco e equipa feitas em convenções de Ficção Científica e da SciFi.com
	#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion/pt:Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion\|Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]], o guia oficial das temporadas 1 a 3''		#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion/pt:Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion\|Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]]'', o guia oficial das temporadas 1 a 3
	#Os Websites do The Sci Fi Channel e da Sky One		#Os Websites do The Sci Fi Channel e da Sky One


	~~This list is an important guideline~~, ~~but its order is not to be slavishly obeyed~~. ~~If David Eick mentions offhand that~~ ''~~Galactica~~'' ~~is four inches long~~, ~~but a reliable source from~~ [[~~Zoic~~]] ~~gives scaling information used in the visual effects sequences~~, ~~deference should be given to Zoic~~'~~s field of expertise. (This would also fall under the guideline of placing on-screen evidence before producer~~'~~s commentary)~~. ~~Obvious gaffes and bloopers should also be ignored~~.		A ordem pode ser alterada quando existir informação comprovada de fontes especializadas. Factos apresentados nos episódios têm precedência aos comentários dos produtores; os erros de filmagens e bloopers devem ser ignorados

			Caso um comentário venha a ser desmentido em informações posteriores, dá-se prevalência à informação actual, deixando uma nota na página [[Continuity errors (RDM)/pt:Erros de Continuidade (RDM)\|Erros de Continuidade (RDM)]].


			'''Lista de fontes não fiáveis''
			*'''Battlestar Wiki'''. Qualquer informação que não tenha sido confirmada pessoalmente pode não ser fidedigna.
			** Excepto as informações fornecidas pelas '''Sources:''' e comentários do elenco ou equipa nos [[BW:OC\|Official Communiques/pt:BW:OC\|Comunidados Oficiais]]
			*'''[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia].''' Sempre que a informação não for devidamente citada.
			*'''[http://www.imdb.com/ IMDB]'''. Sempre que a informação não for devidamente confirmada.
			*'''Scifipedia.''' Esta nova wiki, gerida pelo Sci Fi CHannel, utiliza frequentemente informação da Battlestar Wiki como fonte.
			*'''Páginas de Fãs''' onde não são indicadas as fontes, tais como [http://www.tecr.com/galactica/index.html Battlestar Galactica Tech Manual], [http://www3.telus.net/public/akamyot/chistory.htm Colonial History], [http://www.galacticastation.com/ Galactica Station], [http://www.tv.com TV.com]
			*'''Fontes anónimas''', incluindo aqueles que citam fontes anónimas. A validade destas forntes não pode ser comprovada.

	Where later comments contradict earlier ones, defer to the most recent statement and make a note at [[Continuity errors (RDM)]]. An example of this is the size of the fleet, increased from 40 ships in the miniseries to 75 in the series. If the issue is not decisively settled, make a note at the bottom of the page (see [[Olympic Carrier#Notes]] for an example).

	~~'''List of sites that are not good sources'''~~
	*'''Battlestar Wiki itself'''. This is important. If you read information here that you have not verified yourself, do not trust it.
	** The only exceptions lie with content provided in the '''Sources:''' namespace and comments from any cast or crew member via the [[BW:OC\|Official Communiques]] section of the Battlestar Wiki.
	*'''[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia].''' Where Wikipedia cites its own sources, it can be a useful guide. However, uncited assertions should not be trusted. Recently, other wikis have used Battlestar Wiki-derived information.
	*'''[http://www.imdb.com/ IMDB]'''. IMDB has not demonstrated a rigorous standard of fact-checking.
	*'''Scifipedia.''' This is a new wiki operated by the Sci Fi Channel. However, as have other wikis, Scifipedia contributors have often used Battlestar Wiki itself as a source.
	*'''Fan sites''' such as [http://www.tecr.com/galactica/index.html Battlestar Galactica Tech Manual], [http://www3.telus.net/public/akamyot/chistory.htm Colonial History], [http://www.galacticastation.com/ Galactica Station], [http://www.tv.com TV.com] where they do not themselves cite sources.
	*'''Anonymous sources''', including those that cite an anonymous source. The validity of these sources cannot be verified without bias.

	==Our Weapons==		==Our Weapons==

Syrin at 13:54, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T13:54:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 27 December 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	#*Websites do elenco e da equipa		#*Websites do elenco e da equipa
	#*Entrevistas ao elenco e equipa feitas em convenções de Ficção Científica e da SciFi.com		#*Entrevistas ao elenco e equipa feitas em convenções de Ficção Científica e da SciFi.com
	#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion/pt:Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion\|Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]], o guia oficial das temporadas 1 a 3'		#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion/pt:Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion\|Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]], o guia oficial das temporadas 1 a 3''
	#Os Websites do The Sci Fi Channel e da Sky One		#Os Websites do The Sci Fi Channel e da Sky One

Syrin at 13:53, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T13:53:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 27 December 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:


	==~~Acceptable Sources~~==		==Fontes==
	~~In ''roughly'' descending order of reliability~~:		Por ordem de fiabilidade:
	#~~Content from an aired episode. This includes~~ "~~bonus scenes~~" ~~from season 3 of the Re-imagined Series~~.		#Conteúdo de um episódio emitido, incluindo "cenas extra" da terceira temporada da Série Reinventada.
	#*[http://www.twiztv.com/scripts/battlestar/ TWIZ TV] ~~is a good source for episode transcripts for Re-imagined seasons~~ 1 ~~and~~ 2		#*[http://www.twiztv.com/scripts/battlestar/ TWIZ TV] é uma boa fonte para transcrições de episódios das temporadas 1 e 2 da Série Reinventada.
	#*[http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/Reviews+main.html The SadGeezers Guide] ~~offers comprehensive transcripts for Re-imagined season 3~~		#*[http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/Reviews+main.html The SadGeezers Guide] oferece transcrições muito completas da terceira temporada da Série Reinventada
	#*DVDs (~~subtitles~~, ~~visual evidence~~, ~~and behind-the-scenes material~~)		#*DVDs (legendas, provas visuais, extras)
	#~~Official comments from the producers~~:		#Comentários oficiais dos produtores:
	#*[http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/downloads/podcast/ ~~Episode podcasts~~]		#*[http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/downloads/podcast/ Podcasts dos Episódios]
	#**~~Podcast transcripts are being coordinated at~~ [[Battlestar Wiki:Podcast Transcripts]].		#**O projecto [[Battlestar Wiki:Podcast Transcripts/pt: Battlestar Wiki:Transcrições dos Podcasts\|Transcrições dos Podcasts]] coordena as transcrições dos Podcasts.
	#**{{tlp\|podcastref\|''id''\|''time''}} ~~-- Used for inline citing~~		#**{{tlp\|podcastref\|''id''\|''time''}} – para citações no texto
	#*DVD ~~commentaries~~		#*Comentários Áudio nos DVD
	#*[http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/ Ronald D. Moore~~'s blog~~]		#*[http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/ Blog do Ronald D. Moore]
	#*[http://scifi.com/battlestar/bts/videoblog/ David Eick~~'s video blog~~]		#*[http://scifi.com/battlestar/bts/videoblog/ Vídeo blog do David Eick]
	#~~Other statements from producers~~, ~~cast, and crew~~		#Outras afirmações de produtores, elenco e equipa
	#*~~Interviews~~		#*Entrevistas
	#*~~Cast and crewmember websites~~		#*Websites do elenco e da equipa
	#*~~Cast and crew video Q & As from SF conventions and~~ SciFi.com		#*Entrevistas ao elenco e equipa feitas em convenções de Ficção Científica e da SciFi.com
	#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]]~~'' (Seasons~~ 1 ~~through~~ 3)		#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion/pt:Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion\|Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]], o guia oficial das temporadas 1 a 3'
	#The Sci Fi Channel ~~and~~ Sky One ~~websites~~		#Os Websites do The Sci Fi Channel e da Sky One


	This list is an important guideline, but its order is not to be slavishly obeyed. If David Eick mentions offhand that ''Galactica'' is four inches long, but a reliable source from [[Zoic]] gives scaling information used in the visual effects sequences, deference should be given to Zoic's field of expertise. (This would also fall under the guideline of placing on-screen evidence before producer's commentary). Obvious gaffes and bloopers should also be ignored.		This list is an important guideline, but its order is not to be slavishly obeyed. If David Eick mentions offhand that ''Galactica'' is four inches long, but a reliable source from [[Zoic]] gives scaling information used in the visual effects sequences, deference should be given to Zoic's field of expertise. (This would also fall under the guideline of placing on-screen evidence before producer's commentary). Obvious gaffes and bloopers should also be ignored.

Syrin at 13:47, 27 December 2007

2007-12-27T13:47:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 27 December 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	A Battlestar Wiki pretende ser uma fonte de informação detalhada e fidedigna para uma obra ficcional. Devido à natureza própria das wikis, onde todos podem contribuir, e às interpretações subjectivas implícitas a obras de ficção, é vital citar fontes e verificar factos. A página deste projecto dedica-se a definir '''o que pode ser considerado informação comprovada ou informação de fontes oficiais''' relativamente a personagens, eventos e situações na saga ''Battlestar Galactica''		A Battlestar Wiki pretende ser uma fonte de informação detalhada e fidedigna para uma obra ficcional. Devido à natureza própria das wikis, onde todos podem contribuir, e às interpretações subjectivas implícitas a obras de ficção, é vital citar fontes e verificar factos. A página deste projecto dedica-se a definir '''o que pode ser considerado informação comprovada ou informação de fontes oficiais''' relativamente a personagens, eventos e situações na saga ''Battlestar Galactica''


	__TOC__		__TOC__
Line 7:		Line 8:
	== Preâmbulo ==		== Preâmbulo ==

	O objectivo da Battlestar Wiki não é discutir a legitimidade de fontes não oficiais, mas sim fornecer e disponibilizar informação válida. Apenas citações de fontes oficiais como o [[Sci Fi Channel/pt:Sci Fi Channel]], o [[Ronald D. Moore/pt:Ronald D. Moore]], e elenco ou equipa da [[Original Series/pt:Galactica (TOS)\|Série Original]] ou da [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)/pt:Battlestar Galactica (RDM)\| Série Reinventada]] serão aceites. Qualquer informação veiculada por outras fontes será imediatamente apagada da wiki.		O objectivo da Battlestar Wiki não é discutir a legitimidade de fontes não oficiais, mas sim fornecer e disponibilizar informação válida. Apenas citações de fontes oficiais como o [[Sci Fi Channel/pt:Sci Fi Channel\|Sci Fi Channel]], o [[Ronald D. Moore/pt:Ronald D. Moore\|Ronald D. Moore]], e elenco ou equipa da [[Original Series/pt:Galactica (TOS)\|Série Original]] ou da [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)/pt:Battlestar Galactica (RDM)\| Série Reinventada]] serão aceites. Qualquer informação veiculada por outras fontes será imediatamente apagada da wiki.

	O desrespeito contínuo desta regra incorrerá sanções por parte de um administrador.		O desrespeito contínuo desta regra incorrerá sanções por parte de um administrador.

Syrin: update

2007-12-27T13:46:07Z

update

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 27 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{project\|Citation Jihad\|image=BSG WIKI Citation Jihad.png\|shortcut=BW:CITE<br/>BW:CJ<br/>BW:Jihad}}		{{project\|Citation Jihad\|image=BSG WIKI Citation Jihad.png\|shortcut=BW:CITE<br/>BW:CJ<br/>BW:Jihad}}

	~~[[Wikipedia:Jihad\|Jihad]] is an arabic word meaning "to exert utmost effort, to strive, to struggle."~~ Battlestar Wiki ~~strives to be a comprehensive and accurate source of [[canon]]ical information for a fictional work~~. ~~Because of the nature of~~ a ~~wiki where anyone may contribute as well as the subjective interpretations implicit in a work of fiction~~, ~~it is~~ vital ~~that sources be cited and facts checked~~. ~~This project page devotes itself in defining~~ '''~~what is considered officially sourced or verifiable information~~''' ~~regarding characters~~, ~~events and situations in the~~ ''Battlestar Galactica'' ~~saga.~~		A Battlestar Wiki pretende ser uma fonte de informação detalhada e fidedigna para uma obra ficcional. Devido à natureza própria das wikis, onde todos podem contribuir, e às interpretações subjectivas implícitas a obras de ficção, é vital citar fontes e verificar factos. A página deste projecto dedica-se a definir '''o que pode ser considerado informação comprovada ou informação de fontes oficiais''' relativamente a personagens, eventos e situações na saga ''Battlestar Galactica''
	~~<div style="clear: both;"></div>~~

	__TOC__		__TOC__

	== ~~Preamble~~ ==		== Preâmbulo ==

	Battlestar Wiki~~'s primary goals do not include discerning which unofficial sources have valid information. Our primary goal is to report valid information in an encyclopedic medium~~. ~~Due to this, we will not be citing rumors from any sources other than official channels, such as the~~ [[Sci Fi Channel]], [[Ronald D. Moore]], ~~and other cast and crew of the~~ [[Original Series]] or [[~~Re-imagined Series~~]]. ~~Any information from sources other than those in the list will be immediately removed from the~~ wiki.		O objectivo da Battlestar Wiki não é discutir a legitimidade de fontes não oficiais, mas sim fornecer e disponibilizar informação válida. Apenas citações de fontes oficiais como o [[Sci Fi Channel/pt:Sci Fi Channel]], o [[Ronald D. Moore/pt:Ronald D. Moore]], e elenco ou equipa da [[Original Series/pt:Galactica (TOS)\|Série Original]] ou da [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)/pt:Battlestar Galactica (RDM)\| Série Reinventada]] serão aceites. Qualquer informação veiculada por outras fontes será imediatamente apagada da wiki.

			O desrespeito contínuo desta regra incorrerá sanções por parte de um administrador.

	~~Actions which lead to the repeated reintroduction of said unofficial and unverifiable material will be dealt with by an administrator.~~

	==Acceptable Sources==		==Acceptable Sources==

Syrin at 18:10, 23 December 2007

2007-12-23T18:10:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 23 December 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[Wikipedia:Jihad\|Jihad]] is an arabic word meaning "to exert utmost effort, to strive, to struggle." Battlestar Wiki strives to be a comprehensive and accurate source of [[canon]]ical information for a fictional work. Because of the nature of a wiki where anyone may contribute as well as the subjective interpretations implicit in a work of fiction, it is vital that sources be cited and facts checked. This project page devotes itself in defining '''what is considered officially sourced or verifiable information''' regarding characters, events and situations in the ''Battlestar Galactica'' saga.		[[Wikipedia:Jihad\|Jihad]] is an arabic word meaning "to exert utmost effort, to strive, to struggle." Battlestar Wiki strives to be a comprehensive and accurate source of [[canon]]ical information for a fictional work. Because of the nature of a wiki where anyone may contribute as well as the subjective interpretations implicit in a work of fiction, it is vital that sources be cited and facts checked. This project page devotes itself in defining '''what is considered officially sourced or verifiable information''' regarding characters, events and situations in the ''Battlestar Galactica'' saga.
	<div style="clear: both;"></div>		<div style="clear: both;"></div>
	~~{{Battlestar Wiki List of Policies}}~~

	__TOC__		__TOC__

Syrin: wip pt. page

2007-12-23T18:09:09Z

wip pt. page

New page

{{project|Citation Jihad|image=BSG WIKI Citation Jihad.png|shortcut=BW:CITE<br/>BW:CJ<br/>BW:Jihad}}

[[Wikipedia:Jihad|Jihad]] is an arabic word meaning "to exert utmost effort, to strive, to struggle." Battlestar Wiki strives to be a comprehensive and accurate source of [[canon]]ical information for a fictional work. Because of the nature of a wiki where anyone may contribute as well as the subjective interpretations implicit in a work of fiction, it is vital that sources be cited and facts checked. This project page devotes itself in defining '''what is considered officially sourced or verifiable information''' regarding characters, events and situations in the ''Battlestar Galactica'' saga.
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
{{Battlestar Wiki List of Policies}}

__TOC__

== Preamble ==

Battlestar Wiki's primary goals do not include discerning which unofficial sources have valid information. Our primary goal is to report valid information in an encyclopedic medium. Due to this, we will not be citing rumors from any sources other than official channels, such as the [[Sci Fi Channel]], [[Ronald D. Moore]], and other cast and crew of the [[Original Series]] or [[Re-imagined Series]]. Any information from sources other than those in the list will be immediately removed from the wiki.

Actions which lead to the repeated reintroduction of said unofficial and unverifiable material will be dealt with by an administrator.

==Acceptable Sources==
In ''roughly'' descending order of reliability:
#Content from an aired episode. This includes "bonus scenes" from season 3 of the Re-imagined Series.
#*[http://www.twiztv.com/scripts/battlestar/ TWIZ TV] is a good source for episode transcripts for Re-imagined seasons 1 and 2
#*[http://www.sadgeezer.com/html/Reviews+main.html The SadGeezers Guide] offers comprehensive transcripts for Re-imagined season 3
#*DVDs (subtitles, visual evidence, and behind-the-scenes material)
#Official comments from the producers:
#*[http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/downloads/podcast/ Episode podcasts]
#**Podcast transcripts are being coordinated at [[Battlestar Wiki:Podcast Transcripts]].
#**{{tlp|podcastref|''id''|''time''}} -- Used for inline citing
#*DVD commentaries
#*[http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/ Ronald D. Moore's blog]
#*[http://scifi.com/battlestar/bts/videoblog/ David Eick's video blog]
#Other statements from producers, cast, and crew
#*Interviews
#*Cast and crewmember websites
#*Cast and crew video Q & As from SF conventions and SciFi.com
#*''[[Battlestar Galactica: The Official Companion]]'' (Seasons 1 through 3)
#The Sci Fi Channel and Sky One websites

This list is an important guideline, but its order is not to be slavishly obeyed. If David Eick mentions offhand that ''Galactica'' is four inches long, but a reliable source from [[Zoic]] gives scaling information used in the visual effects sequences, deference should be given to Zoic's field of expertise. (This would also fall under the guideline of placing on-screen evidence before producer's commentary). Obvious gaffes and bloopers should also be ignored.

Where later comments contradict earlier ones, defer to the most recent statement and make a note at [[Continuity errors (RDM)]]. An example of this is the size of the fleet, increased from 40 ships in the miniseries to 75 in the series. If the issue is not decisively settled, make a note at the bottom of the page (see [[Olympic Carrier#Notes]] for an example).

'''List of sites that are not good sources'''
*'''Battlestar Wiki itself'''. This is important. If you read information here that you have not verified yourself, do not trust it.
** The only exceptions lie with content provided in the '''Sources:''' namespace and comments from any cast or crew member via the [[BW:OC|Official Communiques]] section of the Battlestar Wiki.
*'''[http://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia].''' Where Wikipedia cites its own sources, it can be a useful guide. However, uncited assertions should not be trusted. Recently, other wikis have used Battlestar Wiki-derived information.
*'''[http://www.imdb.com/ IMDB]'''. IMDB has not demonstrated a rigorous standard of fact-checking.
*'''Scifipedia.''' This is a new wiki operated by the Sci Fi Channel. However, as have other wikis, Scifipedia contributors have often used Battlestar Wiki itself as a source.
*'''Fan sites''' such as [http://www.tecr.com/galactica/index.html Battlestar Galactica Tech Manual], [http://www3.telus.net/public/akamyot/chistory.htm Colonial History], [http://www.galacticastation.com/ Galactica Station], [http://www.tv.com TV.com] where they do not themselves cite sources.
*'''Anonymous sources''', including those that cite an anonymous source. The validity of these sources cannot be verified without bias.

==Our Weapons==

===Derived Content===

Battlestar Wiki is an encyclopedia on works of fiction. As with all fiction, the characters, technology, events and other items in ''Battlestar Galactica'' are never fully explained or defined. Because of this, contributors are allowed to add material that helps in adding intriguing interpretation and explanation into an article's content, provided that the addition is based on logical or actual events, characters, and objects from official sources. We call this ''derived content''. There are two forms contributors can use as appropriate: '''plausible speculation''' and '''logical deduction'''.

====Plausible speculation====

The ''plausible speculation'' method best works in filling the gaps of data on character motivation or plot direction based on the behaviors or motives expressed by any and all characters as appropriate. When done correctly, plausible speculations add "color" and insight to the article, as well as defining the article's content for readers who may not have realized a significance to the subject matter presented in the article.

Plausible speculation occurs when official sources on the subject are sparse, but substantially important events and results occur in the official sources that logical possibilities can be generated. Plausible speculations are ''highly'' fluid and subject to extreme editing as new official information occurs. Again, '''plausible explanations lend themselves best to character behaviors and motivations.'''

One significant example of an article that uses a great deal of plausible speculation is the article on [[Humanoid Cylon speculation]] and [[Case Orange]]. For contributors of [[Original Series]] content, plausible speculation is all that can be drawn upon on since the Original Series and its [[Galactica 1980|spinoff]] have long ceased production, and there are very few official resources available to consult or research.

====Logical deduction====

The second method is ''logical deduction''. The logical deduction approach differs from plausible speculation in that much more information is available from official content and sources to derive strongly supported article content, despite the fact that the subject matter ''per se'' may not be discussed in any one source, but over a series of sources. '''Logical deductions usually lend themselves best to explanations of technology, terminology or procedure, with technology that has been illustrated, although not fully explained.'''

The subarticles in the [[Science in the Re-imagined Series]] parent article are good examples where logical deduction from sources gives greater insight and detail on a topic from the analysis of screenshots of displays, dialogue, scientific principles, and the like.

===Special considerations in using derived content===

Using either plausible speculation or logical deduction methods require all contributors to cite '''credible official sources that support their speculation or deduction.''' Be sure to use footnote templates or the Sources namespace (see later sections) to add in the references that support your hypotheses.

It is also very important to note the subtle differences between logical or plausible interpretation of observed concepts and events of the show, and '''generating''' ideas of what you or other fans of the show ''believe'' has happened. Don't attempt to explain away a plot hole, circumstance, mistake or other event in the show with your own created idea that hasn't an official source. This mistake is known as [[BW:FANW|fanwanking]]. As a wiki that encyclopedically chronicles a work of fiction, Battlestar Wiki policy on derived content treads all too closely to the problems created in using [[Wikipedia:No_original_research|original research]], which is why '''official sources are critical for any derived content'''.

Articles without obvious official sourcing will be marked for deletion, where contributors have a period of time to improve the article. Articles without any internal links to episode information, characters and events (common to fanwanked articles or fanon) may be marked for [[Battlestar Wiki:Candidates for deletion|speedy deletion]].

===Footnote Templates===
Battlestar Wiki supports the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script for the purpose of making footnotes where in-text citations become too cumbersome. This is the preferred way of citing sources. If you use this method, please make sure the <code><nowiki><references/></nowiki></code> tag is flanked like so: <code><nowiki><div style="font-size:85%"><references/></div></nowiki></code>. In addition to using the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script, all citations are to be in proper format. [[:Category:Citation templates|Citation templates]] have been imported from ''Wikipedia'' to help. Please review the template pages to understand how they are used. These templates should be placed within the <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> tags.

In the past, we have used <nowiki>{{ref}} and {{note}}</nowiki> (imported from Wikipedia) for this purpose. They have been removed from the system. Please see [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php Cite.php] script for examples on how to use the new tags.

We also have taken the liberty of adding {{tl|citation needed}}, a template which does double duty by adding articles needing citations to the [[:Category:Articles requiring citations|Articles requiring citations]] category as well as indicating which paragraph or sentence requires the citation.

Footnotes are most useful to keep the voice of an article from oscillating between describing a viewer perspective or behind-the-scenes notation as opposed to the "in-universe" description of the character or event. Here is an example of where a footnote would aid in keeping the focus of the article on the subject matter and not related matter:

<blockquote>"Ragnar Anchorage resides inside the gas giant, Ragnar. '''Filmed in a sugar mill near Vancouver''', the Anchorage is a Colonial storage depot. '''The main depot area is later used as the Temple of Five in the episode, "The Eye of Jupiter."'''</blockquote>

Here, the out-of-universe comments (shown in bold, above) on the real-world scenery take away the article's attempt to describe Ragnar Anchorage as if it were a real place. By moving these comments to a footnote, the "flavor" of the article and its subject matter is retained.

:''For more on using footnotes to keep an appropriate voice to an article, see [[Battlestar Wiki:Real Point of View]].''

===Sources namespace===
The Sources: namespace exists to host primary source content. See [[Sources:Correspondence with Jose Perez]] for an example. All primary source pages can be seen at [[:Category:Sources]].

===How to cite print sources===

Print sources, such as ''Battlestar Galactica: The Official Magazine'', should be cited with a full MLA style citation in the footnote and, where possible, a brief and pertinent quote. See [[Saul Tigh#References]] for an example.

==Our Missions==

===Articles needing sources===
[[:Category:Articles requiring citations]] provides a list of articles already tagged with {{tl|citation needed}}.
*Any of the alleged [[Zoic]] battlestars not authenticated in episodes or elsewhere: Prometheus; [[Pacifica]]; [[Rycon]] (of which a battlestar ''does'' exist in TOS); Poseidon; Argo; [[Acropolis]].
*Need source on director Ahmer Lateaf from TOS episode "[[Greetings from Earth]]"; does not appear in IMDB.

===Widespread misconceptions (aka "[[Wikipedia:Fanon (fiction)|Fanon]]")===

*The RDM ''Galactica'' is not equipped with [[railgun]]s (see the article, [[Weapons in the Re-imagined Series]], for more information).
*No official sources back up the assertion of the Original Series battlestar ''[[Columbia (TOS)|Columbia]]'' as the namesake for the battlestar class of the [[Colonial Fleet (TOS)|old Colonial Fleet]].
*In addition, while [[Glen Larson]] himself has claimed that there were likely more than twelve battlestars, it is believed by fans that there were only twelve, one for each colony. This is not the case, as no exact number has ever been established, other than those battlestars seen or mentioned in the Original Series' run.
*No official source implies that there are specifically twelve [[Religion in the Twelve Colonies#Belief|Lords of Kobol]].
*The Re-imagined Series of ''Battlestar Galactica'' does not necessarily take place in the "future" relative to our present on Earth. Executive producer [[Ron Moore]], as well as many of the cast and crew, consistently point out that the timeframe of the series is deliberately ambiguous, and could be set in the past, present, or future relative to Earth today.

==Members==
Show your commitment to accuracy. Join up!
*[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:19, 29 September 2005 (EDT)
*[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:20, 29 September 2005 (EDT) (self-dubbed Lord of "It's ''Galactica'' not '''the''' ''Galactica''" Corrections)
*[[User:Day|Day]] 21:49, 30 September 2005 (EDT)
*::"Your episode citations go ''inside'' the period."
*[[User:BMS|BMS]] 17:45, 30 January 2006 (EST) I need to start citing my contribs, and I'll get right on that from here on
*[[User:Fearpi|Fearpi]] 15:50, 11 February 2006 (EST)
*[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 11:21, 17 April 2006 (CDT)
* [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 09:43, 27 July 2006 (CDT) - Template Updating Only
*[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 12:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
*[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 14:28, 29 November 2006 (CST)
*[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 11:47, 8 February 2007 (CST) I hardly ever write anything that ''needs'' citing, but this is a good project.
*[[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 08:40, 10 April 2007 (CDT) - A worthy project.