Template talk:WWW High Traffic: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Template:WWW High Traffic
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (→Links from other sites?: + reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Are there even known instances of high traffic sites linking to a BSWiki article? If so, that would be cool (and I would've completely missed it). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 09:36, 14 February 2007 (CST) | Are there even known instances of high traffic sites linking to a BSWiki article? If so, that would be cool (and I would've completely missed it). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 09:36, 14 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Shane was looking at the stats for the website and noted that we had been linked in a [http://www.digg.com/television/BATTLESTAR_GALACTICA_to_get_a_Fourth_Season Digg.com discussion] and from a (apparently high traffic?) [http://www.warpsection.com/2007/the-final-five/ blog]. While Shane has been known to stay ahead of the curve, in this case it's more reactive than proactive (though it's good to have in place should we ever get slashdotted, etc.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:43, 14 February 2007 (CST) | :Shane was looking at the stats for the website and noted that we had been linked in a [http://www.digg.com/television/BATTLESTAR_GALACTICA_to_get_a_Fourth_Season Digg.com discussion] and from a (apparently high traffic?) [http://www.warpsection.com/2007/the-final-five/ blog]. While Shane has been known to stay ahead of the curve, in this case it's more reactive than proactive (though it's good to have in place should we ever get slashdotted, etc.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:43, 14 February 2007 (CST) | ||
::I tracked our Monday slam from both SciFi downtime and the digg post. We even broke a new record that day. 12k unique visitors for one day. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:13, 14 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:13, 14 February 2007
Links from other sites?
Are there even known instances of high traffic sites linking to a BSWiki article? If so, that would be cool (and I would've completely missed it). --Catrope 09:36, 14 February 2007 (CST)
- Shane was looking at the stats for the website and noted that we had been linked in a Digg.com discussion and from a (apparently high traffic?) blog. While Shane has been known to stay ahead of the curve, in this case it's more reactive than proactive (though it's good to have in place should we ever get slashdotted, etc.) --Steelviper 09:43, 14 February 2007 (CST)