Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for August 2006: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:21, 28 August 2006

Archive - Between July 13, 2006 and August 7, 2006

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Comments

Two "votes" is fewer than I'd like to see, but it looks like unless somebody else offers any other options we can use Colonial One for the FA on the 7th? (Personally, I was waiting for others to suggest more "candidates" before weighing in.) --Steelviper 10:13, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
- All ya need to do is place the {{featured article candidate}} on the article and list them here! :) --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 10:25, 1 August 2006 (CDT)

Colonial One

Support - Has {{quality article}} status and it's very detailed about the ship. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 10:22, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
Support - I'm cool on this article now that I rooted out some edits to standardize it again. --Spencerian 13:20, 14 July 2006 (CDT)
Support - Looks like it's a unanimous win for the Colonial One. --Steelviper 13:11, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
Support - Okay; I'm not too picky about what gets featured during the interseason period. --The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 13:23, 7 August 2006 (CDT)

Cylon agent

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Candidates=
+{{archive-message
-<!-- Add Reason and Vote under your choice for June 2006 -->
+| start = July 13, 2006
-==[[Colonial One]]==
+| end = August 7, 2006
+}}
+== Comments ==
+* Two "votes" is fewer than I'd like to see, but it looks like unless somebody else offers any other options we can use Colonial One for the FA on the 7th? (Personally, I was waiting for others to suggest more "candidates" before weighing in.) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:13, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
+**All ya need to do is place the {{tl|featured article candidate}} on the article and list them here! :) --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:25, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
-==[[Act of Contrition]]==
+== [[Colonial One]] ==
+* {{Support}} - Has {{tl|quality article}} status and it's very detailed about the ship. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 10:22, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
+* {{Support}} - I'm cool on this article now that I rooted out some edits to standardize it again. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:20, 14 July 2006 (CDT)
+* {{Support}} - Looks like it's a unanimous win for the ''Colonial One.'' --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:11, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
+* {{Support}} - Okay; I'm not too picky about what gets featured during the interseason period.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 13:23, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
-*I don't think episode guides are the best thing to feature on the main page, generally. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:35, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
+== [[Cylon agent]] ==
-::While I agree that episode guides aren't nearly as cool as our straight-up articles, I know that the episode guides are what originally brought me here in the first place (and are a major hub during on-season). I was just hoping that through the FA process we could find an outstanding example, further refine it, and have a model that the other episode guides could aspire to. I'm not sure if it's this one, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:11, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
-:::I am planning on proposing an episode article standardization project in the [[Battlestar wiki:Think Tank]] where we do exactly what SV has proposed. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:36, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
-==[[Tricia Helfer]]==
-==[[History of the Twelve Colonies]]==
-*This was originally one of my pet projects, although it's benefited from other users' contributions. I think it's a good example of a well-cited article that makes educated speculation without getting carried away, covers a broad range of interesting topics, and is written in a crisp and concise manner. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
-**On second thought I vote for this one:  labored many an hour on it (I am something of a Timelord...)--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:16, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
-::A fine article, but is there any way we could find a relevant picture to brighten things up? Otherwise it seems to fit the criteria. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:16, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
-{{support}} Changing from neutral to support now that it meets all the FA Criteria. One more pic wouldn't hurt, maybe, and I'm sure some other edits may come along, but it's clean enough in its current state to be a FA in my opinion. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 09:24, 7 July 2006 (CDT)<br/>
-{{support}} Nice, concise article. Probably could used another image per SV. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 10:39, 7 July 2006 (CDT)