Template talk:Interview: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Template:Interview
Line 7: Line 7:
::It just means "if and only if". A good article at Wikipedia outlines its history and use in proofs:
::It just means "if and only if". A good article at Wikipedia outlines its history and use in proofs:
::[[Wikipedia:If_and_only_if]] --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:19, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
::[[Wikipedia:If_and_only_if]] --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:19, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
::Thanks for catching that. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 20:31, 7 August 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:31, 8 August 2006

Thanks for the cleanup! :) --Shane (T - C - E) 02:01, 4 August 2006 (CDT)

You're welcome, of course. I usually read through new templates, and this one was simple enough I didn't think I'd break it in the process. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 02:03, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
New and impoved code without {{qif}} is faster. Though... message box uses {{qif}}. I should fix that. --Shane (T - C - E) 02:15, 4 August 2006 (CDT)

iff you know what I'm talking about

I understand that particular abbreviation, but it's probably best to spell that one out. (Often used in math/computer science/logic.) --Steelviper 11:47, 4 August 2006 (CDT)

Never hear it used before, hat does it mean? Anf it its an acronym it should be capitalised?... --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 11:54, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
It just means "if and only if". A good article at Wikipedia outlines its history and use in proofs:
Wikipedia:If_and_only_if --Steelviper 12:19, 4 August 2006 (CDT)
Thanks for catching that. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 20:31, 7 August 2006 (CDT)