Talk:Marcia Case/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Marcia Case/Archive 1
(+ setnence)
Line 17: Line 17:
Is it too much speculation to write something along the lines of "The current Pegasus CAG is unknown, but it's possible that she assumed the position"? (also for the CAG article). I know that nothing whatsoever has been established about the current Pegasus CAG --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:54, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
Is it too much speculation to write something along the lines of "The current Pegasus CAG is unknown, but it's possible that she assumed the position"? (also for the CAG article). I know that nothing whatsoever has been established about the current Pegasus CAG --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 13:54, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
:If the CAG is unknown, it's unknown. Lee Adama (or his dad) could assign any one, or no one, to the position, change their ranks, etc. I think that is too speculative. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:23, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
:If the CAG is unknown, it's unknown. Lee Adama (or his dad) could assign any one, or no one, to the position, change their ranks, etc. I think that is too speculative. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:23, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
::Yeah, I thought so, but given her rank of Captain and her relative prominence in "The Captain's Hand" it's not pulled entirely out of thin air --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:26, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
::Yeah, I thought so, but given her rank of Captain and her relative prominence in "The Captain's Hand" it's not pulled entirely out of thin air. Btw, Garner refers to a CAG in that episode, so it's not "no one" --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:26, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:28, 18 October 2006

Article subject emphasis[edit]

I wasn't sure which way to go on the emphasis with the callsign wedged in there like that, so I gave it a guess. It will be a non-issue if she ends up with a character data template to hold the callsign info (assuming she's around enough to merit a character data template). --Steelviper 22:29, 18 February 2006 (EST)

Genneraly, It's rank (bold) firstname "callsign" lastname (bold). --The Merovingian 22:43, 18 February 2006 (EST)
Not sure what you mean by that Steelviperbut is that why she isnt listed on the main character page? There are links to characters who died but none for my girl here. *sad* -- Mazzy 13:06, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
What main character page? Well, that little box on the bottom of the character pages, and our list of recurring characters, well both of those only really include characters that have appeared in more than one episode. And although I'm pushing tha agenda "Frak Dualla, make Showboat the new series' Sheba", this is still just a dream. But they can't take the sky from me.--The Merovingian (C - E) 13:09, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
this one V. If you notice Page is a character with one epi and he dies. [[1]] -- Mazzy 13:11, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
La, shes listed under her name, I though i looked for that but hey, sorry *goober alert. Ack. -- Mazzy 13:21, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
Yeah we list people by their real name if possible (if we know it), and link their callsign to their normal name page.--The Merovingian (C - E) 13:23, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
Was just thrown by all the 'S' listings. Thanks for being attentive to my flail ha ha. -- Mazzy 13:27, 8 April 2006 (CDT)

Showboat as Pegasus CAG[edit]

Is it too much speculation to write something along the lines of "The current Pegasus CAG is unknown, but it's possible that she assumed the position"? (also for the CAG article). I know that nothing whatsoever has been established about the current Pegasus CAG --Serenity 13:54, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

If the CAG is unknown, it's unknown. Lee Adama (or his dad) could assign any one, or no one, to the position, change their ranks, etc. I think that is too speculative. --Spencerian 15:23, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
Yeah, I thought so, but given her rank of Captain and her relative prominence in "The Captain's Hand" it's not pulled entirely out of thin air. Btw, Garner refers to a CAG in that episode, so it's not "no one" --Serenity 15:26, 18 October 2006 (CDT)