Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Move Squad: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:09, 12 July 2006

Suggestion: Automatically confer move priveleges on registered users after 100 edits? --Peter Farago 12:50, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

I like that idea --Mercifull ^{(Talk/Contribs)} 13:44, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

100 "usefull" edits. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 14:22, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Ugh. I'm loathe to count up individual edits to determine "usefullness". If by "useful", you mean non-spam/vandalism I would agree (although hopefully they'd be blocked long before they hit 100). --Steelviper 14:25, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Yes. Let us say "100 non-vandal edits". I don't know how we'd even define useful. Fixing a single typo is useful, especially if they fixed a single typo in 100 different articles. That's a lot of proof-reading. And that's a minor edit. As long as we're not looking at 100 edits to link Canadian drugs or whatever, I think we're in the clear. --Day ^{(Talk - Admin)} 15:40, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Let's not be too picky with the criteria here. 100 non-vandal edits should suffice. Obviously, we should probably make a {{move}} template and appropriate categories for users under the 100 edit mark, so new users can suggest moves. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 18:09, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:40, 12 July 2006 (view source) Day (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:09, 12 July 2006 (view source) Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::: Yes. Let us say "100 non-vandal edits". I don't know how we'd even define useful. Fixing a single typo is useful, especially if they fixed a single typo in 100 different articles. That's a lot of proof-reading. And that's a ''minor'' edit. As long as we're not looking at 100 edits to link Canadian drugs or whatever, I think we're in the clear. --[[User:Day\|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day\|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|Admin]])</sup> 15:40, 12 July 2006 (CDT)		::: Yes. Let us say "100 non-vandal edits". I don't know how we'd even define useful. Fixing a single typo is useful, especially if they fixed a single typo in 100 different articles. That's a lot of proof-reading. And that's a ''minor'' edit. As long as we're not looking at 100 edits to link Canadian drugs or whatever, I think we're in the clear. --[[User:Day\|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day\|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard\|Admin]])</sup> 15:40, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

			: Let's not be too picky with the criteria here. 100 non-vandal edits should suffice. Obviously, we should probably make a {{tl\|move}} template and appropriate categories for users under the 100 edit mark, so new users can suggest moves. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 18:09, 12 July 2006 (CDT)