Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
Archive - Between October 2, 2006 and October 8, 2006
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --Peter Farago 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Shane (T - C - E) 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I nominated it only as a joke. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Peter about it needed a decent cleanup --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:29, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Cylon agent

  • Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --Peter Farago 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

FTL

  • Comment: I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. But... --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --Peter Farago 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as well. --Shane (T - C - E) 20:30, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

William Adama

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Shane (T - C - E) 20:32, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good article about possibly the most important character in the show. --BklynBruzer 21:04, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. That is a good one, and we've been techno-heavy lately. Vote's changed. --Spencerian 23:01, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)